And doesn't liberating Iraq mean getting rid of the foreign fighters?
2007-03-10 17:37:46 · 12 answers · asked by Longhaired Freaky Person 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Josh, from someone who's so picky about people answering your questions, you don't exactly return the favor, do you?
2007-03-10 17:41:53 · update #1
tabs, the UN is not authorized to intervene in the affairs of sovereign states.
2007-03-10 17:43:55 · update #2
US air strikes aren't indiscriminately killing people in Iraq?
2007-03-10 17:51:45 · update #3
I agree with your assesment.
The USA removed Saddam....so we won.
NOW IT IS TIME TO LEAVE! LET THE IRAQIS RUN IRAQ.
2007-03-10 17:40:57 · answer #1 · answered by Villain 6 · 3⤊ 3⤋
USA provides most of the foreign fighters who are ignorant of what they are dying for....no doubt.
--but really, where is that pesky parade for the US occupying forces? They have been trying to sell ad space for 4 years...
They need some floats and a marching band or two.
I can hear the trombones and the tubas now before the Baghdad Bowl - between Notre Dame and Michigan or
maybe Ohio State and Auburn fighting for the Golden Burka.
Half time entertainment by Brittany "half baldy" Spears...
That would be sweeeet.
2007-03-11 05:39:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Strawman
Strawman is an answer to your question... I don't think anyone has ever suggested that liberating Iraq means getting rid of ALL foreign fighter. They are more interested in getting rid of...
Iranian fighters
Syrian fighters
AQ fighters
General religious nutty fighters
You know... the ones that are indiscriminately killing people in Iraq.
U.S. air strikes are designed to kill only terrorist and minimize civillian losses. The other fighters in Iraq seem to be doing the opposite, targeting public places instead of U.S. forces.
2007-03-11 01:39:58 · answer #3 · answered by Josh 4 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Yes
2007-03-11 03:13:20 · answer #4 · answered by brainstorm 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
BTW,the people of Darfur are pleading with the UN for help. Once again,the UN turns a deaf ear. So,I guess no one should help them according to your logic,since that would mean "outsiders" coming to help them.
Here's the link ;
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070310/wl_nm/darfuris_feature_dc
2007-03-11 01:42:14 · answer #5 · answered by tabs 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
If we pull out of Iraq and the country becomes 20x worse than it already is, can i hold YOU personally responsible. If Iraq turns into a pre 9/11 Afghanistan or a modern day Iran, can I hold YOU responsible for this? Please give me a yes or no on this one.
2007-03-11 01:43:56 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
yep go to one of my last couple question some guy posted a link showing the accual numbers of people sent from each country.
2007-03-11 01:53:00 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Possibly. Don't you believe the locals in Iraq deserve to enjoy the freedom you enjoy. I do.
2007-03-11 01:49:59 · answer #8 · answered by GFW 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Libertaing Iraq means defeating those that don't want it to be free...meaning the Islamic terrorists, that is.
2007-03-11 01:42:48 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
no they are mostly coming from saudi arabia the muslim capital. its not terrorist we r fighting terrorism is a criminal act we r fighting fundamental muslims
2007-03-11 01:47:03 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋