is it considered liberal hypocrosy????

Question

that most liberals want the U.S. to lose the war in the middle east yet they constantly complain about the number of soldiers that die over there????
if any liberals can actually say they want things to work out and america to win wow you have my respect!!!!!!!!!!

Answer 1

First the USA needs to have a victory plan for our nation to win!!

There is no final victory plan. 3100 dead Americans is quite enough in the endless war in Iraq.

Answer 2

1) We think the death toll of not just soldiers, but all people in Iraq is ridiculous and unnecessary. We did not want to start this war in the first place.
2) We have already declared a so called "victory" in Iraq. We have completed our primary objective and that's remove Saddam, so we don't see a need to still be there undermining the sovereignty of the Iraqi government. So, you do not understand the definition of win or the definition of leave/end.
3) You also need to look of the definition of hypocrisy(its saying on thing and then doing the opposite) wanting a country to lose a war and complaining about the death toll of soldiers is not hypocrisy.
4) You need to look up the liberal platform because you obviously do not know it. You have access to the Internet get to know both sides of an argument before taking one.

Answer 3

i wouldnt consider myself liberal but i did oppose the war from the beginning as it is unessecary & i challenge u to find a good reason to be there
BUT i do support us winning not by the # of terrorist killed but by focusing on reconstuction & establishing a working govt, trust me it can be done not by using tough love stance but by extending the hand of friendship & respectanything else does us dishonor + the noe-con hypocracy is 100000x worse than the lib 1 because neo-con has ramifications here are 3 examples #1 we boycott cuba for being commies & human rights violations YET we r chinas biggest importer who violate human rights are commies and has a WMD stockpile w/ bio & chem weapons and 1000's of nukes + the kill alot of budhist pplhypocracy #2 we rush in to invade iraq w/bad fabricated intel BUT N korea & iran are testing WMD and delivery systems to take us and our allies out and bush seeks diplomacy? #3 bush claims to be Christian yet will cause the death of countless innocents and any way u look at it if u truly believe the teachings of Christ u will know in the gospel it is wrong i would make an exception for self defence but iraq could never ever be a threat to us anyone could see that it is TRUTH. now we have more problems there and the r increasing every day dont be misled by the BS the truth is obvious

Answer 4

How can you win when by all measures just being there fuels the conflict and is increasing the number of terrorists. Also what good does supporting the shia dominated government do? Is not Iran enough of a problem without giving them an ally next door.

Answer 5

ALL stories regarding the actual reasonings for war revolve around corruption, abuse of power, and Greed. No plan going in, no plan to get out--unless of course there's a 30 year Oil-giveaway to ours and Britains Oil Conglomerates and we have a 14 base, 5,000 member embassy to boot. NOT GONNA HAPPEN.
http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/9927782.htm

You do recall Bush 1's reasoning for not invading Iraq--do you not?

You remember when Bush confided in you that we weren't looking for a Western presence there?

Time to brush up on the facts and rethink your thought. This WAR is all of our problem and the World's by proxy---get a clue, a good first step would be admitting that liberal views are not your problem.

Answer 6

Many liberals are hypocrits, the number of troops lost so far pale in comparison to the number we have lost in previous wars. Like WWII, 3000 a day would be almost a constant. So, 3100 in what, 4-5 years sounds a hell of alot better to me then 3100 in 3-4 hours. So I am with you on this.

Answer 7

i want what is best for the world, iraq, the united states, etc

i dont honestly know if our presence over there is helping or making things worse, and i tend to complain more about the 600,000 iraqis lost than the few thousand americans

Answer 8

You can say that again . So is algore's mind-control campaign on global warming considered liberal hypocrisy . Leave it to Hollyweird to honor a man for saying humans are responsible for the weather .. And then captain hypocrite ..wonder of the Internet , goes and gets caught using tens of thousands of dollars monthly for his own energy uses . I'd be laughing a lot harder if not for the fact that these nitwits want to perpetrate this fraud so they can tell us how to live ..like peasants ..while they tax us for the privilege .

Answer 9

Liberals, as you call it, want to RESCUE OUR SOLDIERS. They are VALUABLE and deserve to be taken out of Iraq. They are involved in a Civil War that they cannot win, and they were LIED to in the first place about going to Iraq.

I am so tired of Ultra-Conservatives happy to give SOMEONE ELSE'S LIFE. You want to "WIN"? Take the Republican Congress, Bush, Cheney, and everyone else who is Conservative and go over there. Quit placing innocent lives in danger over a LIE...

Answer 10

I'm a Democrat and I say it's time to either "shoot", "****" or "get off the pot".

Either reinstate the draft and raise taxes or get the hell out!

Our military is stretched too damn thin and we can't just keep going further in debt.

Answer 11

46% of the US (according to the latest USA Today poll) think it's impossible to win. Only 11% think we will. You do the math.