English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

3000 innocent people being murdered is a little hard for me to "Get over it" Thanks..but... No Thanks!

2007-03-10 16:42:41 · 9 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

9 answers

Well people dont want to admit that the towers were pulled by Bush and his cronies so he could justify this pathetic war in Iraq.. which has done nothing to help bring democracy or peace but has done a lot to secure oil rights for American companies..

When Bush is gone, I'm afraid America needs to be brought to justice along with Israel and UK .. this is one of the worst acts of war criminiality in the histroy of man. and YES those people were murdered, call them human sacrifices so that bush could have his war, with the help of networks like Fox he was able ot convince the voters.. silly silly Americans.. look what you voted for.. I seriously doubt it happened as reported there are far too many anomolies now.. and I think people are sick of being silenced now too.. even the patriot act fialed.. and all the other measures are failing to stop the facts seeping through.. I also wonder what hit the pentagon, and what Silverstein (owner of the twin towers) meant when he said he had to "pull" tower 7??? he must've had it rigged with explosives to pull it.. these were his own words as shown on Fox!! now PLEASE EXPLAIN!!!

2007-03-10 17:00:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

I will remember that day for the rest of my life. I am not over it, I will not get over it and I don't ever want to get over it. My Coast Guard Auxiliary unit responded out of New Jersey that day and watched from the water as both towers collapsed.

Brenda, I know who the enemy is and it is not George Bush. It is not Dick Chaney. It is not CO2 emissions. It is not large corporations. It is not racism, sexism or homophobia.

The enemy is radical Islam. It has been at war with us since the Iranians took our embassy personnel hostage back during the Carter administration. We chose diplomacy with madmen. We gave money. We made concessions. We minimized the threat. We built walls that forbade sharing of information between the CIA and the FBI. We generally chose to ignore it. Until it bit us hard on 9/11.

Now some want to go back to pretending that threat is not out there. It is. So far this Commander-in-Chief gets high marks for protecting our shores from further attack. Let us pray the American people choose as wisely the next time.




.

2007-03-11 01:09:48 · answer #2 · answered by Jacob W 7 · 3 1

I wouldn't necessarily say "get over it". It was a horrible loss, and it shocked the nation, but at the same time how long are you going to use 9/11 to justify insane foreign policy? If you are so upset by all the innocent people that died that day, how do you feel about the tens of thousands of innocent people dying in our war? It may take them a while to "get over it" as well.

2007-03-11 00:51:06 · answer #3 · answered by CelticPixie 4 · 1 1

Don't be too hard on them if you don't know if they loved someone or not

If they had they will be still grieving in their own way.

I think that is where you are.

Others who were not affected personally tend to distract from the others

I would say to move on, take your memories with you and prepare your self for the next one.

It is only a question of where and when, and not if, anymore

2007-03-11 01:23:43 · answer #4 · answered by Murray H 6 · 0 1

It's been 6 years almost people with time move on we did after Pearl. Its sad but true.

2007-03-11 00:45:48 · answer #5 · answered by bpeter3196 5 · 3 1

Answer, that never happened to me. No one I ever spoke to said such an ignorant thing.

2007-03-11 00:50:36 · answer #6 · answered by livefree 4 · 2 0

Admitting that we're actually at war is very inconvenient for some people.

2007-03-11 00:47:23 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

They tell you to get over saying Bush did it.To whom am I speaking? Lisa,Katrina,Ginger,Lory,Susan... Brenda, Bob, Susy Q, Nancy, Curly, Moe or Shep. I clicked on one of your questions that said "Asker Lisa" and the question came up with Brenda's tag. Can't keep all your accounts straight can you. Doesn't do much for your creditability. Is it not also corrupt to have many accounts or avatars, to ask questions then answer them yourself and give yourself "Best Answer". Huh. isn't it? Many on this site as, you know have said the same. Below is one such answer about you.
thenextjfk - No, the funniest one is when I asked if Nancy and Crypto Jew Girl (2 separate accounts!) were the same person, and BRENDA answered "no we are not"
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index....

Here is another


As people have caught on to what she is doing, particularly the high volume of spam of late, she has added numerous screen names on an almost daily basis.

It does appear that she is having trouble keeping track of who she is when she asked a question...and who she is when she answers.

The funniest one I came across was when she asked a question with one name...answered it with another...and then awarded herself 10 points for having the best answer!

She claims in her spam for the protest that she supports the Troops 100%. If that is the case and your protesting Bush next Saturday, then why don't you have your little meeting in the park across from the White House. If you aren't protesting our brave Troops then why is the protest at the Pentagon. It is well established that you are a fraud and a cheat.

2007-03-11 00:46:33 · answer #8 · answered by ohbrother 7 · 7 5

People sense that there is a cover up and they don't want to know about it. They are scared to find out how horrid the real world is.

2007-03-11 00:47:54 · answer #9 · answered by realst1 7 · 1 4

fedest.com, questions and answers