Will the brand extension ever end?

Question

ECW is fine b/c it is supposed to be a stand alone company when it really isn't. It would be better for both RAW and Smackdown ratings wise if they let wrestler wrestle on both shows. I find it also unnecessary to have 2 world belts, 2 next best thing belts, and 2 tag belts under one roof.

Answer 1

Blah, I wish. It's just too much, and, with over 15 pay-per-views a year, I'm surprised people are still buying them. The extension is especially useless now that people from all three brands are showing up on the other shows. They used to make such a big deal about Wrestlemania being the only time someone from Raw could face someone from Smackdown, and now that's out the window, as well.

Answer 2

The brand extension helps get lesser talent over and a chance to be seen we go back to just the same thing as when the 2 shows started all the major talent dominates the shows and the lesser talents get a 5 min match as a filler the brand extensions work only because moe talent is allowed to be shown

Answer 3

It's 3 world titles by the way and no, not as long as WWE keeps making money. They split the tour by have Raw and Smackdown/ECW tour separately and thereby make double the money they otherwise would.

Answer 4

Pretty much it's just pointless now. If guys basically just keep on going on other shows all the time what's the point of pretending to do the brand split? It isn't like there's any point in trying to keep on pretending that these are all separate companies anymore when pretty much everyone and they're mother already knows Vince owns it all.

Answer 5

The reason why we can,t do that is because of some wrestlers who hardly appear on smackdown or raw.Funaki hardly appears on smackdown and if they put the two brands together then he will never get a match.

Answer 6

no it probably wont but id like it if it would

Answer 7

Maybe.