hands down gladiator, it had way better acting and was way more convincing. Don't get me wrong 300 was good but gladiator was better
2007-03-10 15:05:15
·
answer #1
·
answered by a_really_really_cool_kid 1
·
3⤊
0⤋
Definately Gladiator
2007-03-10 15:10:17
·
answer #2
·
answered by sapphire_71_99 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
Gladiator
hands down
2007-03-10 15:02:54
·
answer #3
·
answered by *MRS>TOM BRADY* 3
·
5⤊
0⤋
Great question. Im gonna say Gladiator by a little
2007-03-10 15:07:02
·
answer #4
·
answered by Release Anwar Al-Awlaki NOW 1
·
3⤊
0⤋
300 by far.
Two different movies.
One is actually based on history and tries to represent it.
The other (300) is based off of a graphic novel (comic book) shot-for-shot so the history isn't all there. It is just more for a very well designed and fresh movie to view.
2007-03-10 15:23:22
·
answer #5
·
answered by Tyler E 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
gladiator....revenge by redemption
"what we do in life....echoes in eternity"
300....sacrifice without question
2007-03-10 15:45:09
·
answer #6
·
answered by AtThePub 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
how can u ask me this question? this is like by far the worst thing u asked me to compare...
2007-03-10 15:37:28
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
300!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IT ROCKED MY SOCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I HOPE YOU CAN TELL HOW AWESOME IT WAS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
2007-03-10 15:02:49
·
answer #8
·
answered by tribute_13 3
·
0⤊
4⤋