English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-10 14:59:12 · 8 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music Movies

8 answers

hands down gladiator, it had way better acting and was way more convincing. Don't get me wrong 300 was good but gladiator was better

2007-03-10 15:05:15 · answer #1 · answered by a_really_really_cool_kid 1 · 3 0

Definately Gladiator

2007-03-10 15:10:17 · answer #2 · answered by sapphire_71_99 2 · 3 0

Gladiator

hands down

2007-03-10 15:02:54 · answer #3 · answered by *MRS>TOM BRADY* 3 · 5 0

Great question. Im gonna say Gladiator by a little

2007-03-10 15:07:02 · answer #4 · answered by Release Anwar Al-Awlaki NOW 1 · 3 0

300 by far.

Two different movies.

One is actually based on history and tries to represent it.

The other (300) is based off of a graphic novel (comic book) shot-for-shot so the history isn't all there. It is just more for a very well designed and fresh movie to view.

2007-03-10 15:23:22 · answer #5 · answered by Tyler E 4 · 0 0

gladiator....revenge by redemption

"what we do in life....echoes in eternity"

300....sacrifice without question

2007-03-10 15:45:09 · answer #6 · answered by AtThePub 4 · 0 0

how can u ask me this question? this is like by far the worst thing u asked me to compare...

2007-03-10 15:37:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

300!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! IT ROCKED MY SOCKS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I HOPE YOU CAN TELL HOW AWESOME IT WAS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

2007-03-10 15:02:49 · answer #8 · answered by tribute_13 3 · 0 4

fedest.com, questions and answers