English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Trading Ahman Green was the best move we could have made. This young team made a run at the playoffs last year and would have been the most feared team if they would have made it. This young team is talented. Week 17 vs Bears. Killed 'em. This team will go atleast 11 wins next season. Morrency reminds me of a young Jamal Lewis who just runs people over. The o-line is set. The d-line is set. The only concern would be a safety and a tight end. This team will be the surprise of 2007. You heard it first. I predict them to go 12-4 with a first round bye. The best record in NFC will be the Saints at 12-4, possibly 13-3. The Bears will slip by going 10-6. The Eagles at 10-6. The Cowboys at 11-5. And finally, the Seahawks will win the tie breaker over rival Arizona at 9-7 to sneak in.

2007-03-10 14:52:39 · 28 answers · asked by mgreens69 1 in Sports Football (American)

INSTEAD OF SAYING NO THEY SUCK BACK YOUR TALK UP WITH YOUR TEAM SAY WHY THEY WILL TRUE SPORT NUTS SAY MORE THAN 1ST GRADE REMARKS

2007-03-10 14:58:28 · update #1

28 answers

I have a feeling the Packers are going to have a good time come Drafting Day. Since this is Brett Favres last year or close to it, I think(just like the saints) the spirit of the team will overcome athletic setbacks. Do i personally think the Packers will make it, Yes I'm a Saints fan too but i cant help getting over how the Packers will shock people. Your record was 8-8 last year. You guys will have a 11-5 record and head to the Superbowl well that is a big possibility

2007-03-10 16:07:20 · answer #1 · answered by Preston S 2 · 0 1

You should be working in Vegas or Atlantic city. You could also do good as an analysis the stock market.

The Packers will surprise everyone if they even make the playoffs let along get a bye week. I think you need a QB the one you got is living off rep and that alone.

It is time for him to join Paul Hornung, Vince Lambardo, the Golden Boy and other great Packers that have retired and are now standing on the side line cheering on the present Packers so they can once again they can reach the top of the heap again as they once were.

I hope this has been of some use to you, good luck.

'FIGHT ON"

2007-03-10 20:53:13 · answer #2 · answered by Skip 6 · 0 0

This team is still a very young team if you think of it, Sure Favre comes back and gets the team over .500 but I am unsure if they will make the Superbowl let alone the playoffs. I live in Wisconsin and I talk about this stuff all of the time. If they do happen to make the playoff's, they will be a wildcard for sure. The Bears will take the division, and Green Bay will have a better record than Minnesota. But you still have to think about all of the other teams who have NFC playoff potential... can the Packers beat the Eagles? Saints? Cowboys? Seahawks... Bears? It is just too hard to comprehend that Green and Gold will make the big one... let Favre break some more records and continue to rebuild..

2007-03-10 15:53:32 · answer #3 · answered by stopburningbridges 1 · 0 1

Farve and his ego for breaking records is the Packers stumbling block! I see him as more as an embarrassment than a starting QB! His decision making, his quickness, and his ability to throw into coverage has suffered badly. He has been the main reason for the fall of your beloved Packers! But as so many have in the past, they play 2,3,4 years too long. He has the mind set he is 25 years old, and can get away with throws he used to make but cant now. He's also been very inconsistant as a player. I also put the blame on the coaching staff for not setting his butt down on the bench. the difference i see with him and Marino, was in Miami, the coaches called 80%+ of the plays, and since they were so predictable, the defemses figured out where the play was going; hence the accumulated number of INT's. Farve has been given the go ahead to change a play at any time, and at 50% he does just that. the past 3 or 4 years its been his downfall. He's extremely selfish, and to me not the team player he was during the years of their playoff runs. Now its about passing Marino for most TD's....and more than likely he'll break it. But i guarrentee he'll throw more INT's than Td's getting there!

2007-03-10 16:02:38 · answer #4 · answered by MRJERK715 2 · 0 1

The Packers are getting better, but I think the Eagles will be the team to beat in the NFC next year. They will get McNabb back and will be dangerous. I think they will go with the more run oriented offense they used at the end of last season, except with McNabb at QB instead of Garcia. The Saints are a young and talented team, and will definately be in the hunt as well. I only see them getting better this year.

2007-03-10 15:21:11 · answer #5 · answered by atvman_400 5 · 0 1

ahman green wasnt traded, he was picked up off free agency by the texans

i dont think the packers will get 12 wins, there prob gunna get between 8-10 wins (there only going to get 12 wins because there in a horrible division)

they have a good chance at making the playoffs (like every team does at the beginning of the year) but there not going to win the super bowl

2007-03-10 14:58:47 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

Another delusional Packer fan. They went 8-8 because the division they play in sucks. They went on a playoff run because the teams they played sucked. The Bears didn't even show up week 17. Rex Grossman put up more points for the Packers than Brett Favre did.

2007-03-10 18:21:50 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

All of the teams no doubt will make a run at the Super Bowl, but sorry the Packers won't be there. Saints are going all the way this time.

Sorry Bobblehead, Joe Horn was great for the Saints for a couple of seasons, but the Falcons should have stayed clear of him, his better years are definitely behind him. Also Michael Vick sucks. It really doesn't matter who the Falcons have at wide receiver, Vick can never find anyone but the TE anyway.

2007-03-10 14:57:37 · answer #8 · answered by p_doell 5 · 0 2

I hate this debate. Aaron Rodgers has extra expertise around him than Favre EVER had. Favre performed with dogshit for many of his profession. heavily, Dorsey Levens and Antonio Freeman have been his key weapons on their great Bowl team. (Andre Rison grew to become into sturdy, yet in user-friendly terms a million season.) He had driving force for a jointly as, yet Favre made driving force. human beings ask your self why Favre continually threw up dumbass throws previous due in video games. He grew to become into attempting to make something ensue. 0 have confidence in the bafoons he grew to become into fiddling with. heavily, Terry Mickens, bill Schroeder, Dorsey Levens, Edgar Bennett, Ahman eco-friendly, Javon Walker. those adult males could no longer do squat while they went someplace else. And Rodgers has weapons left and genuine, to no longer point out arguably the superb protection in the NFL. If eco-friendly Bay each and every did something in unfastened company to help Favre out or might have positioned a million/2 the expertise around him that Ted Thompson has positioned around Rodgers, Favre's legacy may be diverse and so might have his # of great bowl jewelry And IDC what fool Packers followers say, Bart Starr isn't the guy in eco-friendly Bay. Brett Favre is the guy in eco-friendly Bay. he's the superb quarterback which will EVER play for that corporation. Rodgers is a stud, and he's desperate as much as win 3+ great Bowls with the team he's on. yet he's not extra effectual than Favre. No way.

2016-09-30 12:22:01 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

wk 17 bears already clinched im not saying the packers are horrible im just saying try to avoid sounding like an arrogant cowboy fan theyre not that great give em 3 yrs or so an if they make the right moves maybe but 2007 packers in the super bowl not really gonna happen

2007-03-10 15:11:33 · answer #10 · answered by will B 2 · 0 1

fedest.com, questions and answers