If you haven't already, try Foreskin-Restoration.net. They have a forum there where restorers can discuss this.
It's a long thing to do (some take two years) but it seems like most end up satisfied after doing it. However, keep in mind that not everything is restorable; some things are just lost in circumcision, such as nerves.
http://www.norm-socal.org/lost.htm
Foreskin anatomy:
http://www.cirp.org/library/anatomy/
http://www.twbookmark.com/books/70/0446678805/chapter_excerpt15690.html
Most parents just find it easier to leave their boys alone so they can choose what they want in the end, and be satisfied in the end no matter what. =)
2007-03-10 15:16:31
·
answer #1
·
answered by Jorge 7
·
6⤊
1⤋
I was mutilated and violated.
Many men learn when they are older just how badly they have been damaged. When I was 20 some years old I thought I was ten feet tall, bullet proof, and could pound nails with my willy. Now I know I was mutilated; I am damn lucky if I can get off from intercourse before she tells me to get off.
These children should wait till they get out of diapers before spouting off about how great it is to be mutilated. They will learn the sad truth one day.
Females should keep their "foreskins are yukky" opinions to themselves unless they have been to Africa and had themselves "improved" too.
A problem to keep it clean? If I can spend 10 minutes a day shaving my face I could skin it back when I shower and spend five seconds giving it a once over with soap and water, and I would rather handle my willy in the shower than run a razor over my face! Do boys really need a reason to handle their things, think about it!
There are no real health benefits to circumcision it is just plain primitive, barbaric mutilation, like putting a bone through your nose.
I have joined the thousands of men that are non-surgically restoring their foreskins by tissue expansion. Many that have completed their restorations say they are now experiencing the best sex of their lives; better than in the back seat of a 1969 Impala. Remember these men are still missing 70% of the sensory receptors that a normal penis has. For the most part the only nerves left in their penises are pain receptors not pleasure receptors, the pleasure receptors were cut off and discarded in the foreskin.
2007-03-11 18:57:40
·
answer #2
·
answered by cut50yearsago 6
·
5⤊
0⤋
Violated? Of course!
Restoring? No. Its such a long and arduous process. The restoration can be good but never quite the same as the "original". And you can never actually restore the nerve ending density that was cut away.
2007-03-10 14:51:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Tom K 7
·
5⤊
0⤋
If men do not question why their foreskins were forcibly removed from them as babies, then they probably don't feel violated and will continue the mutilations with their sons etc.
For those of us that truly understand the functioning of the foreskin and how it enhances the male sexual experience will, understandably, feel violated.
Stop the routine circumcision of baby boys now! It's their bodies, their rights and no parent should have the right to decide that for them except under extreme medical necessity.
2007-03-13 04:44:54
·
answer #4
·
answered by Jake D 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
It's sad that a lot of parent's feel it's an inconvenience to spend a little extra time to clean their baby's penis. I think the infection issue is ridiculous. Women get yeast infections, some get it regularly. I wouldn't cut part of my vagina skin to prevent it! The only reason people feel this way is because of the pressure of society that says how your body must look! Maybe if people stopped making men with foreskin feel like freaks and start educating their sons about cleanliness they would seek out better medical attention when it comes to their penises and infections would be less of a problem. It's an excuse for laziness and teenage boys to jump out of bed and not bathe (I went to school with a lot of those types). So what if a lot of women like it? If they are going to judge you on one aspect of your body then you don't need them. Would you ask them to chop off their breasts because you like a flatter chest or get butt implants? Remember how doctors used to tell women not to breast feed and that they should douche.
2007-03-15 14:46:01
·
answer #5
·
answered by Cristina 2
·
3⤊
0⤋
I wasn't cut, THANK GOD!, so I don't have to restore anything, but, yes, a lot of guys do feel violated and resent their parents for letting themselves be brainwashed into allowing mutilation. For a few of their stories go to http://www.norm.org
This is not whining or not being tough. These guys just want to have the great kind of sex lives and the personal physical comfort that we intact men take for granted. They have my sympathy and support.
2007-03-10 14:52:32
·
answer #6
·
answered by Maple 7
·
6⤊
1⤋
In one sense I do feel violated, as no one bothered to ask me. if they could perform a non emergency surgical proceedure on my person However, it has probably turned out for the best as I have no foreskin problems to worry about. I briefly thought about restoration, but I'm happy as I am.
2007-03-10 15:37:07
·
answer #7
·
answered by Steamysteam 5
·
0⤊
2⤋
violated? nope try happy im so glad im cut and will never try restoring
2007-03-10 18:06:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by freded_124 3
·
0⤊
3⤋
I don't fee; violated ... rather i feels cleaner.
I didn't restoring was even a possibility.
2007-03-10 14:50:07
·
answer #9
·
answered by Sean 4
·
0⤊
4⤋
I can't imagne fore skin can be restored. Once it's cut that's it.
Don't feel violated.
2007-03-10 14:50:01
·
answer #10
·
answered by Mightymo 6
·
1⤊
4⤋