The people are pleading for help from them and also say the Africa Union forces are useless. Will the UN do the same as they did to Rwanda?
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20070310/wl_nm/darfuris_feature_dc
2007-03-10 14:22:11 · 11 answers · asked by bebop 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
This is just another instance in which nothing will happen unless the United States does something. The UN has never done anything successfully, in which it was created to do
So we'll end up getting involved and when things get violent, the libs will say Bush lied about the starvation
Sound familiar?
2007-03-10 14:26:59 · answer #1 · answered by John 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋
The UN have demanded that the government disband the janjaweed. they have asked for larger cooperation with help companies. they have provided a communicate communicate board for the government, SLM/A and JEM. With information from the UN the Darfur Peace contract has been time-honored and there grew to become into additionally the Machakos protocol. this is extraordinarily lots all they might do. they do no longer seem to be entitled to do something that impacts on the sovereignty of Sudan without permission from the Sudanese government.
2016-09-30 12:20:52 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What exactly do you expect the UN to do ?
UN peace keepers are only allowed into countries with those countries permission.
The Sudan has denied that permission.
The UN Security Council could use Article Seven and forceably interviene.
But then the Security Council members would have to contribute soldiers for the intervention.
The UN has no soldiers themselves, all UN peacekeepers are supplied by UN member nations.
And last but not least:
How could the UN and Security Council justify interviening into a civil war in the Darfur region of Sudan.
While critising America and Britian for interviening in the civil war in Iraq right now.
2007-03-10 15:12:26 · answer #3 · answered by jeeper_peeper321 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The UN gives as much help as they can, and they are continuing to do more...
Darfur is a terrible thing, but the UN is ultimately in charge of doing it, and its not like they hold global votes for people to vote in... they do what they do....
and they have done a lot, certainly.
Enough? Whats Enough?
Its Done, or not Done... and they are Not Done as of now...
With the War on Terror and everything else going on, Darfur loses a lot of public attention...
2007-03-10 15:12:58 · answer #4 · answered by Corey 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
They are too busy scaring the west with Global Warming
2007-03-10 14:33:16 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
The UN help????
now there is an oxymoron
2007-03-10 14:28:04 · answer #6 · answered by 007 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No bribe or kick back money only poor people.
2007-03-10 15:08:34 · answer #7 · answered by ? 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
That's why Joe Biden is the only candidate to elect in '08.
He is the only American strong enough to enforce a no-fly zone there.
please watch the video. it is really short.
2007-03-10 14:30:12 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
Its a civil war- remember your dictum- stay away from civil wars/
2007-03-10 14:29:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
because it`s muslims killing Christians,and we are the scum of the earth!
2007-03-10 15:14:24 · answer #10 · answered by truckman 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋