hello, wake up!
2007-03-10 14:19:38 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Entertainment & Music ➔ Celebrities
Why would anyone believe he is guilty!?! No matter how much people wanted to destroy him nobody could find even a shred of evidence that he did anything! You're the one who needs to wake up and figure out that you're brainwashed by the media!! I read the trial transcripts and the only evidence they had was a kid who told a different story every time he told it and parents who are known to be gold diggers!!
♥♥We Love You Michael!!!!♥♥
2007-03-13 02:59:36 · answer #1 · answered by ♥Stranger In Maine™♥ (Thriller) 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I can't say with certainty whether he's innocent. It looks awfully suspicious though. Whenever a celebrity goes on trial for something, esp. in California, there's always "not enough evidence". When Paris Hilton ripped up that poster and stole that DVD, even though it was caught on video and there was an eyewitness, there still wasn't enough "evidence". These celebs get off while you and I would be sitting in jail or prison for the same crimes. So even if Jackson was caught on camera doing sexual things with a kid there still wouldn't be enough evidence. The jury would come back and say "oh, that was a Michael Jackson impersonator" or "oh, that was LaToya wearing Michael's wig". Then people would say "why don't you arrest LaToya?" and the DA would say "oh, we don't arrest women for sexual abuse of a child, only men".
2007-03-10 23:13:25 · answer #2 · answered by DawnDavenport 7 · 1⤊ 2⤋
Its a hard thing to comment on. He could be trying to re live his child hood as it was pretty much taken away from him. And a lot of what you hear is from media and they love to extend the truth to make somebody look bad.
2007-03-10 22:47:20 · answer #3 · answered by Ryan O 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Well where's the proof he did? The judicial system couldn't find it. MJ is weird, for sure, and his obsession with kids is a little socially inappropriate, but given his own circumstances, it's understandable. Leave him alone, he didn't move because he was guilty, he moved because everybody thinks he is.
2007-03-10 22:46:46 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
He isn't. If he was, he would have not left the country after being found innocent.
2007-03-10 22:30:42 · answer #5 · answered by Stormhaley of Steelers 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Denial is very strong. Faith in someone you admire can be a very blinding emotion.
2007-03-11 08:40:19 · answer #6 · answered by krupsk 5 · 1⤊ 2⤋
most people don't know if he is innocent or guilty.
because there is no proof duh....
2007-03-11 18:36:33 · answer #7 · answered by Jennifer 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋