just wondering???lol
2007-03-10 13:39:06 · 10 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
The Omega-Loser.
2007-03-10 13:42:37 · answer #1 · answered by Vegan 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Your first premise is incorrect--second place is not first loser. Losers are the ones who do not participate. The ones who never tried are losers, the ones who cheat are loosers. losers, the ones who refuse to do their best are losers. In MANY contests, there are no losers. In some contests, they are all losers.
2007-03-10 13:44:46 · answer #2 · answered by mistrhistre 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The last loser.
2007-03-10 13:40:56 · answer #3 · answered by Stephanie73 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The loser of all losers!
King loser!
2007-03-10 13:46:32 · answer #4 · answered by tdc923 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Aw c'mon! Isn't being the first loser more than enough?
2007-03-10 19:00:53 · answer #5 · answered by charliecizarny 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
the biggest loser
2007-03-10 13:43:53 · answer #6 · answered by david 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Who cares who is last? The most important thing is whether or not you reached your goal and what is your next one.
janaki
2007-03-14 08:52:54 · answer #7 · answered by enlightenment2121 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The third winner.
2007-03-12 08:04:25 · answer #8 · answered by Can music save your mortal soul? 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Also ran.
2007-03-10 13:44:24 · answer #9 · answered by jim_elkins 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
"Humiliation."
2007-03-10 13:42:37 · answer #10 · answered by Lief Tanner 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋