English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Fox news was going to host a debate in Nevada and Edwards had a fit and cried because Fox does not give him unbridled love. What is Edwards scared of?

2007-03-10 13:18:35 · 32 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

http://blog.johnedwards.com/story/2007/3/9/20352/75748

2007-03-10 13:47:36 · update #1

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,258181,00.html

2007-03-10 13:51:58 · update #2

32 answers

2nd to Gore. I would tell you what else he is but I would have to go to rehab.

2007-03-10 13:25:38 · answer #1 · answered by Nationalist 4 · 4 4

the certainty that the mainstream media sat in this tale, and that the national Enquirer scooped them on it, shows how lots interior the tank they're for Obama, Edwards, and different Democrats. an identical element has got here approximately to Larry Sinclair. The mainstream media is sitting in this tale as properly. hopefully human beings will initiate complaining and supply up permitting the MSM to supress the certainty to cover the asses of their chosen applicants. that's particularly unseemly. hopefully quickly the MSM will rigidity Obama to renowned his little gay intercourse and cocaine escapade with Sinclair back in 1999.

2016-10-18 01:58:08 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

It's funny, he wants to President of the United States, but won't take part in a debate on Fox. How would he ever face the media if he did in fact become President? President Bush has had to deal with a very liberal national press, do-nothing but whine liberals in congress and fighting a war. If Edwards can't handle a debate on Fox how would ever be an effective President of the United States?

2007-03-10 13:37:05 · answer #3 · answered by rosi l 5 · 2 4

Some people like me don't like Fox News because their presenters don't actually let Democrats speak. They just shout over them. I mean, let's be honest about it - they do do that!

If I was Edwards, I'd say, "Sure, I'll be in your debate, so long as Hannity and O'Reilly are kept in New York and I actually get a chance to speak/answer questions and not have some Fox News pundit spouting his or her opinions all the time".

2007-03-10 13:24:37 · answer #4 · answered by lesroys 6 · 7 3

Edwards probably knows that in order to do well against the pathological lie party, the GOP, he has to have airtime. Fox, as publicity arm for the GOP, was doing their bit to gag him.

The crying part sounds like a lie of your own. I mean, I doubt that he actually cried. But Fox should be hit with a lawsuit if they are not giving equal time to candidates.

Also, kindly note, even if Edwards is a big crybaby, he at least isn't a mush-brained retard like Dan Quayle or W.

2007-03-10 13:23:31 · answer #5 · answered by martino 5 · 5 6

Perhaps "does not give him unbridled love" is a bit euphemistic. It would be more realistic to say "refuses to provide any opinion without the taint of right-wing bias".

Mind you, Fox News is known for their right-wing bias--Roger Ailes has outright admitted to it. John Edwards simply refuses to recognize them as a news outlet with any semblance of journalistic integrity, and I applaud him for that.

2007-03-10 13:26:00 · answer #6 · answered by Mystery Viscera 2 · 4 4

Your question is not possible to answer. The Democratic party is full of crybabies and to say that old John is the biggest of them all is like trying to decide which one of the democrats is the most crooked.

2007-03-10 13:25:06 · answer #7 · answered by just the facts 5 · 5 7

Shouldn't be so critical unless you've walked the walk. He's a human being and, clearly, amazingly accomplished (where's your seat in the Senate?). Disagree with his policies, but keep the personal low-blows to yourself.

2007-03-10 13:24:33 · answer #8 · answered by joie_du_cor 3 · 6 5

All the Democrats are cry babies and they are also liers, cheaters, murders, (ask Ted Kennedy about this), and some of the lowest form of skum on the earth. If they don't have the news stations giving them the upper hand they don't want to play.

2007-03-10 13:24:44 · answer #9 · answered by gigi 5 · 5 7

He is just too smart to even go on Fox.. Why would he, they favour the Republicans and anything he said or did would be covered in a bias way.. Good for him that he refused.

As I've said before, Fox is maybe one step above the cartoon network...

2007-03-10 13:23:42 · answer #10 · answered by Debra H 7 · 6 8

He's trying to not associate himself with liars and warmongers who only tell the stories that favor them. When is Rudy going to go on CNN and answer questions about his incestuous marriage to his cousin?

2007-03-10 13:23:34 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 4 6

fedest.com, questions and answers