Americans don't like to think about that because the alternative answer is horrifying.
2007-03-10 13:15:23
·
answer #1
·
answered by Ferret 5
·
2⤊
5⤋
Your implication is obscene. No member of the military would accept an order to do this.
WTC: Jet fuel (the aircraft were fully fueled) caused incredibly high-temperature fires, sufficient to warp the support structure and melt metal. The building then collapsed under its own weight.
Pentagon: It damaged all five rings, AFTER it penetrated a two-foot-thick reinforced outer wall. The aircraft penetrated all the way to the ground floor of the third ring. The hijacker dived so low the aircraft actually hit the ground before hitting the building, thus costing him some kinetic energy. The wings snapped first, so the bulk of the penetration was by the fuselage and engines.
2007-03-10 21:27:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
5⤊
2⤋
The heat from the fire got so intense that it melted the steel girders supporting the WTC. Pieces of airplane were found at the Pentagon. I guess they brought them in on a truck and threw them there while everyone was looking the other way. Give me a break. I don't like Bush either, but he did not plan 9-11.
2007-03-10 21:14:25
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
3⤋
let me put this in terms that you can understand my young friend.
If you put a gallon of gasoline in the center of your house and light it. your house might be destroyed in a couple of hours.
If you put a gallon of jp4 (aviation fuel) in the same spot your house will be destroyed in less than 15 minutes
The ignited fuels burn so hot that it increases the total accumulated fire (as a whole to burn almost 1000 times) hotter than if the fire had started with a slow igniter.
It is very hard to explain to a lay person but look at videos on aircraft carriers when they catch on fire. It is overwhelming to even speculate in you small brain how fast - the ignition point of these fires. "Instant" does not serve proper exclamation.
Thus burns hotter and faster than the mind or eye can calculate.
Ok here is another analogy
a match-
a welding torch
a match will burn itself out in a few seconds
a welding torch is impassive to your pain and stupidity
Hows that analogy?
2007-03-10 21:21:56
·
answer #4
·
answered by richard_lee_boyd 2
·
4⤊
1⤋
You left out the controling factor,,,all the planes had just refueled,thus they were flying bombs. 20,000 gals of jet fuel at 300 knots makes a pretty good bomb. Also, the towers were poorly constructed to withstand a direct hit like they did. The plane that hit the Pentagon was completly demolished. The plane that went down in Pa was also wiped out.
2007-03-10 21:16:08
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
7⤊
1⤋
The fuel for transatlantic flights is large
(small fires ? what illiterate bimbo told you that ?)
When the fuel dropped & exploded in the elevator shafts . . .
The rest is common sense for persons of even average intelligence so no point in a 10 page explanation of building and fuel fires.
2007-03-10 21:16:02
·
answer #6
·
answered by kate 7
·
5⤊
2⤋
What your asking is like asking how did a frieght train traveling at 70mph knock me over when I was standing on the tracks.
2007-03-10 21:35:51
·
answer #7
·
answered by flyguy03 3
·
4⤊
1⤋
http://www.debunking911.com
Isn't this the exact same question that Brenda asked earlier today?
Come on Nancy, you are really slipping!
2007-03-10 23:09:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Airplanes flew directly into the buildings. You have no idea what an irresponsible person you are.
2007-03-10 22:04:47
·
answer #9
·
answered by nobsallowed 2
·
2⤊
2⤋
Sorry to bother you on this fascinating question but are you one of the RLP hateclub?Ifso let's get together.If not nevermind
2007-03-10 21:15:24
·
answer #10
·
answered by ? 1
·
1⤊
2⤋
It was a giant conspiracy pulled off by a criminal mastermind .... no wait, I thought Bush was a dunce? Which is it?
2007-03-10 21:12:26
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
6⤊
1⤋