I personally think TNA is better than WWE for a few reasons.
1. Better storylines
2. More wrestling
3. Better atheletes
4. Better moves
2007-03-10 12:27:17 · 13 answers · asked by Alex V 2 in Sports ➔ Wrestling
I personally think that WWE is far more better than TNA. First, storylines. Everytime the storylines start, the TNA announcer always announce that the wrestlers have something to say. And everytime they have something to say, its always in the ring or backstage with a TNA background. More wrestling. Of course, all there storylines are short. With 1 hour, there filling it up with a lot of wrestling. Better athletes. I saw them tossing wrestlers and I can't even call it athletic. Better moves, yeah. They have awesome moves but do they really hurt. I know its fake but it looks like it doesn't hurt at all. TNA is hitting with WWE. They better watch there back or a dvd might be released with the name "The Death of TNA".
2007-03-10 15:45:47 · answer #1 · answered by ncoy_tx 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
TNA was in the right direction until they decided to try to be WWE (focus on entertainment.)
1- Both company need better script writing .
2-Not really ? how is 1 hour wrestling going to top 2 hours of SD , 2 hours of RAW ?
3 What ? Shelton is athletic . How are you saying Steiner , Nash and Joe to be better athlete than say er London , Benjamin and Helm.
4 Really ?
2007-03-10 12:36:55 · answer #2 · answered by Ming P 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Personally, I don't care if u think TNA is better than WWE. I personally think that WWE is WAY better than TNA, but I dont care, have ur own opinion of WWE.
2007-03-10 12:30:13 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Those things are true right now, but Vinnie mac has had a wakeup call during the Rosie Trump match. Since that point RAW has been improving. If WWE continues to improve after WM he will be on the right track. If not WWE will be in trouble.
2007-03-10 12:53:02 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
1. Hell yeah. TNA's storylines are more interesting.
2. Correct on that as well. More awesome concept matches.
3. Yes. Better athletes= better matches.
4. Yes. Very innovative.
2007-03-10 12:36:33 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
TNA has better in ring action but WWE has better story lines.
2007-03-10 12:38:18 · answer #6 · answered by HULK RULES!! 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
no way is tna better than wwe.
2007-03-10 13:15:11 · answer #7 · answered by undertaker dead man walking 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
wwe is way better they have the shortest time on a wrestling show they have less athletes and the worse storyline.
2007-03-11 06:17:31 · answer #8 · answered by Blond3 BombShell 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
I Disagree
2007-03-10 12:39:48 · answer #9 · answered by ryaaan 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
me too
tna tna tna tna tna tna
2007-03-10 13:04:48 · answer #10 · answered by Refresco 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋