Is it true that the moon landing was staged?

Question

The one with Neil Armstrong and the "big step for mankind" quote. I've been hearing it a lot.

Answer 1

The fact that ANYONE believes that the moon landing was staged is evidence that people are getting to the point where they will believe ANYTHING. I have students ask me about this all the time and the evidence they raise is so embarassingly childish it is no wonder they believe it. I will only share one because my time is too valuable to entertain such moronic theories:

1. If we really landed on the moon, then hwy did the flag wave and flutter in the breeze when there is no wind or atmosphere on the moon?

THAT is the quality of the accusations.

(The answer of course is that the flag had a horizontal bar attached to a spring along the top of the flag to hold the flag horizontal so it could be seen. When the pole was placed in the ground the spring understandably moved, causing the flag to move.)

This is a great site that debunks virtually ALL of these ridiculous theories. However it will require individuals who believe in these "fake moon landing" theories to do something they obviously don't do very often:

READ.


Here it is:


http://www.badastronomy.com/bad/tv/foxapollo.html


Good luck.

Answer 2

that's an incontrovertible medical actuality that we landed on the Moon. The conspiracy concept relies upon totally upon undesirable technological know-how and defective challenge-loose experience. No, there is not air on the Moon. The flag did not wave from a breeze; it vibrated from its own momentum because of the fact the astronauts stuggled to plant it into the lunar floor. that's challenge-loose technological know-how. And no modern-day telescope may even come close to to accomplishing the sub-milliarcsecond determination which would be mandatory to needless to say be certain the touchdown web content. The artifacts left on the touchdown web content are virtually 1 / 4-million miles away, and yet are basically countless ft in the time of. there's a mountain of self sustaining data that proves, to the optimum a threat nicely-known, that we went to the Moon. evaluate here: a million) Apollo 11 left a retroreflector on the lunar floor that astronomers have detected hundreds of situations. 2) self sustaining radio telescopes, while pointed on the Moon, detected the Apollo transmissions. If there hadn't been a deliver there, they'd not have heard something. 3) The Moon rocks have been thoroughly analyzed via geologists, who end that the rocks shaped billions of years in the past on the Moon. They clarify that there's no way for NASA to pretend the rocks. 4) No scientist rejects the landings. If there became something fishy on the subject of the landings, could it not be scientists who could observe? as a replace, scientists are the 1st to vigorously shield the landings. This data is irrefutable; to reject that's to reject all modern-day technological know-how.

Answer 3

you know what, i was just going to ask that question.
i am starting to believe they didn't really land too, because what they say about the stars not appearing in the sky and all is actually true. i have watched many videos of that landing and i have not seen stars in the moons sky. when you are on the moon you should be able to see a sky booming with stars because it has no atmosphere what so ever, but you don't see that in the movie. there is also an image where you see earth rising from the distance, from the moon earth should appear much bigger because its about 4 time bigger than the moon so its like seeing the moon but 4 times larger which means we should see the horizon blocked by the image of earth. there were also bets were you could see things shining right above the astronauts heads, that could be the strings attached to them so that they can walk as though there is less gravity.
we may have seen a rocked launched into space, but that rocket could have been empty.
i hope the moon landing was for real because Niel Armstrong is my best hero, but i have seen the actually movie and those things are right. if NASA can give me an explanation then i would listen.

Answer 4

Some people believe it was staged on a backlot in a Hollywood studio. I don't believe it's true. I guess if you want to believe that the American gov't is evil, you would probably believe it was staged. I was alive when it happened and I believe we actually landed on the moon. When President Kennedy was in office he wanted us to achieve it by the end of the sixties, and remember we were in a race with the Soviet Union at that time.

Answer 5

No it is not true. My brother-in-law was there at NASA and his family watched it go up. He was working at NASA. You know, you will find lots of people who deny everything and you need to be careful. Some of these people who put these things out are from elsewhere to begin with and just want to bash our country and others are just conspiracy nuts. Neil was on the moon and he also went to the same church as my mother-in-law.

Answer 6

Yes! And they found the moon REALLY IS MADE OF GREEN CHEESE! Get real. Everyone knows those big Saturn rockets they fired off from Cape Canaveral in Florida were actually stage props!

Answer 7

Man did in fact land on the moon.

There are many conspiracy theories that try to prove that the moon landing was staged. All of them have been debunked.

They sound good on the surface, but if you look into them, their supporting facts eventually fail them.

Answer 8

Absolutely! The "Magic Bullet" theory for the J.F.K assasination was correct. There are little green men on Mars.
It never rains in Southern California, and gill nets don't hurt dolphins.

Answer 9

i think it likely that they did land on the moon or they would have won 19 Oscar's for it,many dreams were shattered to find out the moon was not a large chunk of cheese...foxy

Answer 10

Yes we went to the moon. Just ask yourself this, is everything was a hoax, then why didn't our enemy (the USSR) not expose it and humiliate us in front of the world. Reason, we really did go so there was nothing to claim.