Should NASA spend billions of dollars in building a research facility/colony on the moon?

Answer 1

Only if people could live there and not just stay up there for a few months. I want a real colony !

Answer 2

interior the long-term this is a robust element. Exploration is nice. what isn't good is doing issues like putting yet another guy on the moon? Why? so as that they are in a position to stroll around in greater airborne dirt and dust and play some greater golf? it particularly is purely a waste of funds. the government ought to spend OUR money greater useful, and it ought to keep a super kind of funds to help human beings right here in the international. yet not by using taking it out of the area software. government overspending continues to be a super situation. restoration it, even particularly, and we would have a lot of funds to help out a super kind of people. NASA is a robust element. it rather is mere existence enrichens mankind. It supplies us wish for the destiny. There are actually not many different issues that provide us that form of wish.

Answer 3

Should Christopher Columbus and Ferdinand Magellan have stayed in Spain?

Should the mayflower have stayed in Britain?

We would have a colony on the moon by now had we not stopped going in the ‘70

We might have already been to mars as well

There will eventually be a time that we are forced to leave this planet do to overpopulation and other reasons.

Do you want to be caught with your pants down?

..

Answer 4

Seeing as the earth population is growing at an exponential rate, to colonize only yes...

I do not believe that military bases should be built on the moon, because once the U.S. has a military base other countries will compete for one, and who knows what they will be able to do from those bases. Spy with satellites as the moon orbits past the U.S.....launch rockets? Who knows, why find out?

Answer 5

I would say probably not. While it would be a great thing to have a permanent manned base on the moon, it would also be very expensive and that money could probably be better spent on other things.

In the early days of the space race, it seemed important for the US and Soviet Union to develop space technology which would also be useful for fighting a nuclear war - not withstanding the inscription on the first plaque left on the moon "We came in peace for all mankind"

Answer 6

Are we planning to? That would be cool.

Remember, NASA isn't throwing the money into a black hole. They spend it on researchers, manufactuers, construction workers, fuel, materials, and so on. Every dollar that NASA spends corresponds to seven dollars spent in our economy as a result. No matter what they're doing with the results of their work, NASA is a great investment - in our economy and in education.

Answer 7

With all the money that they use to do that it would go a long way to help the poor and the needy. There are things down here on this planet that should be address first.
Billions and Billions of dollars are spent to take care of NASA, but yet we have poverty and millions dying each year from
malnutrition each year.
So I say, NO, . . . . .NO WAY. !!

Answer 8

Yes. It would give us a strategic advantage over any enemy countries because any base they build is going to be at least 90% military.

Answer 9

only if we run out of Earth space, because we could use a few billion dollars to save millions of people from poverty and disease

Answer 10

If they did, it would end up a military base. In that case yes!