2007-03-10 09:37:34 · 7 answers · asked by Stephanie W 1 in Consumer Electronics ➔ Music & Music Players
the nano is smaller and weighs less than the iPod.
2007-03-10 09:39:23 · answer #1 · answered by вrιanna 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Ipod nano is firstly smaller. The Ipod nano also uses flash memory over a hard drive which has no moving parts so is not effected by motion, compared to the Ipod which does use a hard rive and can be damaged or skip by movement. The nano also has a much smaller screen than the regular Ipod. The Ipod nano also lacks the ability to display any video or exclusive Ipod games, which the Ipod only can do.
2007-03-10 17:43:40 · answer #2 · answered by firemandan900 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Big diffrence.,,
the ipod nano is like 1/5 of a normal ipod vedio
the ipod nano ranges from 2gb-8gb and does not play vedios
the ipod video has 30 gb model and 80 gb model...
Its a lot...
if u want one, get the nano, but u can use the 30 or 80 gb as a HD or vedio player which can be connected to a tv!
2007-03-10 17:43:36 · answer #3 · answered by michel s 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
hate to answer a ? w/ a ?, but isn't the nano actually an ipod model?
2007-03-10 17:44:58 · answer #4 · answered by remlap47 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
size mostly !! i dont like the reg ipod too big
2007-03-10 17:43:00 · answer #5 · answered by LOVE IT<3 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
size and capacity.
2007-03-10 17:40:21 · answer #6 · answered by michael 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I POD IS BETTER
2007-03-10 17:42:10 · answer #7 · answered by prettygal 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋