If any other country had invaded Iraq like the USA did what would the USA be doing?

Answer 1

are you saying any other country other than Israel, then the U,S, would have had their pantie's in a wad , same as when Iran and Iraq were fighting, if there was anyone else president other than a Bush, as I do believe that Saddam was a personal vendetta for the Bush's , now the question is why since Iraq was our ally for so many years?since there is no reason Saddam was involved in Drugs he was not interfering with the Bush's drug monopoly, so,there is only one thing i can see that is clearly obvious, OIL,, since the Bush's are involved in oil and have many good friends in the oil business and they have made a killing since the U,S, invaded Iraq how can you come to any other conclusion? or is it since the Bush's blood line seems to be toward Jewish , and the fact that the Zionist are the ones who put Bush's into power.and he owes them for his success, both of them, ? as he did get rid of Israel's worst enemy, can some one come up with a legitimate reason, please share it wtih us as I am anxious to know the real truth, I am aware that The bush';s owned oil wells in Kuwait, but, of course that comes back to our reason for invading is again oil.no W,M.D, were ever found and Bush knew there was not any there to Begin with,
the U,N, inspectors had assured Bush that no W.M.D. existed in Iraq, the Israeil'i Mossad are the only one';s who said there was and it was on the new;s that they had people in Iraq who were very realible, and they assured us that there was W,M,D, now they are trying to say saddam moved them to Syria? are Americans stupid enough to believe this B,S,
that he moved his weapons to Syria when he was facing a much stronger force? Saddam was not that stupid , he needed everything he had and then that was not enough,
so Israel screwed America again, and are getting away with it as always before.

Answer 2

Other countries did "invade" Iraq like the U.S. did, including but not limited to Great Britain and Australia.

Answer 3

Lets see... they (Iraq) were in violation of numerous UN Resolutions, President Clinton had stated the policy of "Regime Change", and President Bush went to the UN to gain their support for military action as prescribed in their PRIOR resolutions.

SO, if another country had invaded Iraq LIKE we did (cause and intent), we would have allied with them and backed them.

Please get off your liberal bias

Answer 4

Probably acting like they care but staying very, very far away from the war between the two countries. Just like no one else really wants to deal w/ our war, although some do b/c it's affecting their country too. Unless it was Canada, then I don't think USA would want anything to do w/ it.

Answer 5

It would probably depend upon who did the invading. In the 1980s, when the USSR invaded Afghanistan, the US sent aid to the Afghan mujahadin, many of whom became the Taliban. The US encouraged Muslims from other parts of the world to go to Afghanistan to fight the Russians; Osama bin Laden was one who went.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_war_in_Afghanistan

Answer 6

study ALL OF THIS before YOU choose!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!... no, no longer precisely. it has extra to do with scuffling with terrorist and getting back at hussein for 9-11 and extra whatnot. in case you havent observed ISREAL isn't A SLAVE united states of america. isreal has the u . s . a .'s help because of the fact our united states of america was once a good, god-fearing, ethical united states of america. now, dont nag at me for this, reason i understand im killing myself right here, yet, the Bible says that Isreal is Gods chosen human beings and thats why they werent wiped off the map a protracted time in the past. i propose, no longer many historic countries have survived, some has, like isreal, yet no longer many. and isreal is so small, which you will possibly think of that they may be long previous by making use of now, yet they arent. theey are given nuclear weapons to look after themselves. weapons are taken removed from them because of the fact they're muslim countries(and tyrannical) and the muslims have faith its alright to bloodbath human beings and wipe out countries if that gets them to make muslim faith extra unfold. the conflict on terror is to maintain them removed from isreal and different unfastened countries. Iraq and russia are allies, purely like the U. S. and isreal. russia is scared europe will help because of the fact maximum of europe is the U. S.'s allies. if a a hundred years from now, that's seen as a collection off for WW3, then iraq, might desire to be seen because of the fact the single pulling the set off. your clips are too overly-media. you have observed the MEDIA are those that make the wars appear as if something they do no longer seem to be. ZIONIST businesses ARE religions purely like MUSLIM businesses, or CATHOLIC orgs, CHRISTIAN orgs, ect. they have as lots stunning to exsist because of the fact the subsequent, specific, to wipe NAZIs off the map, because of the fact they have been making plans to take over the international. ZIONIST arent doing something like that. in case you will possibly open you eyes to the previous, to no longer some rinky-sink information media clips, you will possibly see that.

Answer 7

Well if saddam was the guy leading the U.S. and someone came over here and freed me from a man that gassed 100,000 of us because he wanted to try out his new WMD's I would be pretty greatful

Answer 8

When the USSR similarly invaded Afghanistan, we boycotted the Moscow Olympics.

Answer 9

helping out like we always do.Saddam was a ruthless,dangerous tyrant who had to be removed from power.Just because it is now a dirty business,don't cry foul!!! War is never pretty or neat and that is the problem in this country.As soon as it gets messy all the liberals cry about what a big mistake it was.God help us if they win in 08!!!

Answer 10

The US would send troops to support the other country if the cause was just.