When the Democrats had control of Congress.
2007-03-10 09:37:02
·
answer #1
·
answered by Its Hero Dictatorship 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
I honestly don't know the year in which it was enforced. I just know that children were used as a means for cheap labor. Children first, then probably the mentally ill and minorities and then women. That is why so many of the minority and poor have so many children. Back when my father grew up, children were an extra hand on the farm. I know the change happened somewhere around the time I was born. Children were then seen as more a gift from God. That was in one way a good thing.......on the flip side was too many kids thinking they were so darned important that the world couldn't rotate without their help. We went from kids being an important part of things ,to kids thinking they were so friggin hot that they didn't need to be a part of things.
Clean your room? FU! Do your homework? FU!
Just like why Opra gave her millions to the kids in Africa because they just wanted to learn....and kids here were wanting an I-Pod and "special" shoes.
All throughout history we have used and abused anyone that was considered weak at that time. Whether it be based on sex, color, age, race ,or anything else.
I "thought" we were better than that. I know I am...but I guess we didn't advance as much as I thought we did. The almighty buck still wins.
2007-03-10 09:55:00
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
child labor laws
Laws passed over many decades, beginning in the 1830s, by state and federal governments, forbidding the employment of children and young teenagers, except at certain carefully specified jobs. Child labor was regularly condemned in the nineteenth century by reformers and authors (see David Copperfield and Oliver Twist), but many businesses insisted that the Constitution protected their liberty to hire workers of any age. In several cases in the early twentieth century, the Supreme Court agreed, declaring federal child labor laws unconstitutional. Eventually, in the late 1930s, the federal Fair Labor Standards Act was upheld by the Court. This law greatly restricts the employment of children under eighteen in manufacturing jobs
2007-03-10 09:38:10
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
During the US industrial revolution, children were used as a prime source of labor. Many families, especially those who had immigrated and had no foundation in the country, were forced to send their children to work in order to afford housing and food. Children had nimble fingers, did what they were told, and could work long hours. Their small arms and hands could reach inside of industrial machines and fix problems adult workers couldn't reach.
In 1832, New England unions condemned child labor. Union workers protested the unfair and cruel treatment of children, who under typical work conditions often suffered serious, disabiling injuries.
In 1836 the first minimum age laws were proposed for factory workers. Massachusettes passes first state child labor law that required children under age 15 employed by facories would have to attend school at least 3 months per year.
So the first law was in 1836.
2007-03-10 09:49:42
·
answer #4
·
answered by Erin 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
unlawful immigration motives many problems it is for particular. it is an undeniable certainty. Given your estimate of 20 million illegals enable's proceed from there. enable's say even a million/3 of them are preserving jobs. it particularly is extremely almost 7 million people interior the artwork rigidity. Contributing to the tax base and so on. that ought to go away 7 million interest vacancies. could our united states of america have the potential to attend to that many leaving the artwork rigidity? probable no longer. could individuals step into those jobs for the pay presented? probable no longer. businesses base line is earnings. could they strengthen wages to get individuals to artwork those jobs? probable no longer. extra businesses could start to outsource. for this reason leaving many individuals out of jobs that now carry jobs. Our total united states of america could cave in and the super melancholy could appear like a cakewalk. As i've got stated unlawful immigration is faulty and needs to stop. yet we additionally could be lifelike on deporting as you're saying 20 million people. have self belief me...it won't take place for particularly some motives. So we could pass forward and think of of lifelike ordinary methods to handle the situation handy and additionally insure the unlawful situation is stemmed interior the destiny. extra perfect border secure practices and visa structures could be dealt with first and finest so the situation would not gradually worsen. as quickly as the pass is stopped we are able to then artwork on what to do with those already right here.
2016-11-24 19:07:24
·
answer #5
·
answered by isador 4
·
0⤊
0⤋