1. a woman who engages in sexual intercourse for money; whore; harlot.
2. a man who engages in sexual acts for money.
www.dictionary.com
2007-03-10 09:22:31 · 4 answers · asked by DizziDazi 4 in Society & Culture ➔ Cultures & Groups ➔ Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, and Transgender
Yes, if a partner is just in the relationship for money I would consider them a prostitute. However, my husband completely supports me yet I married him for love. I would be married to him whether he was a pauper or a prince. I just got lucky and married my Prince Charming :)
2007-03-10 09:39:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 0⤋
You answered your own question - the dictionary definition says a woman who engages in sexual intercourse for money - not specifying married or unmarried, with or without kids - there fore meaning they can be as long as They're engaging in sexual intercouse for money
2007-03-10 17:38:28 · answer #2 · answered by waggy 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no. a prostitute are people who stay out late at night on a corner of a street, waiting for people to pay them for sex. My mom was a single mom for a long time and she was never a prositute. People dont have kids because they either want to wait or they just dont want any. If they are married then they are in a relationship, so they're not prostititues.
2007-03-10 17:44:25 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hmmm, I sure hope not, cause i never considered myself one! My sig. other makes good money doing what he loves. He loves me and wants me to be happy, and i hate working. If he wanted or needed me to work i would...what's so bad about us?
2007-03-10 17:40:17 · answer #4 · answered by Mia 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋