In discussing Islamic terrorists the line between the PC and the un-PC seems to have been drawn at the use of these words - you can't discuss Islam, you have to put the words "radical" and/or "extremist" in front of it, otherwise you're called a racist (even though Islam isn't a race) and your question or answer is pulled from YA.
But what is the difference between the radical or extreme and the mainstream?
In the case of Islam there's a centuries-old tradition of spreading the religion by murder and mayhem, going back to the religion's founder, Muhammad. Yes, other religions have violence in their histories but typically this was the founder's religion being corrupted. The Church committed acts of violence but in doing so went against everything their religion's founder said and did. Muhammad killed thousands of people, massacred entire villages, to spread his religion. And he wrote a Koran that says to do the exact same thing.
Was Muhammad not a mainstream Muslim?
2007-03-10
09:03:51
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics