Neither
I'm casting a vote for Anna Nicole, at least now she can't make any stupid statements. I can't say the same for Obama or Clinton.
2007-03-10 09:35:49
·
answer #1
·
answered by Nighthawk 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Unfortunately, Clinton. She seems to have a comanding lead for the nomination & the Clintonistas are ruthless. I hope that neither is elected because I know of nothing good about Clinton & the only good thing about Obama is that he isn't Clinton.
2007-03-10 17:01:41
·
answer #2
·
answered by yupchagee 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
IDK...it is a long way until the primaries, anything can happen. If this question is asked again 9 months from now, I guarantee answers will be different.
But if I had to pick one, I would say Obama. I feel Clinton is trying too hard to obtain votes from certain groups.
2007-03-10 17:27:38
·
answer #3
·
answered by Todd R 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Between those two at the moment, I'd say it's a tossup. After a few primaries are held, we'll all have a better idea. Personally, I'd prefer having an Edwards/Obama ticket.
2007-03-10 17:06:51
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Hillary
2007-03-10 17:15:36
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Rupert Murdoch owns fox news and a majority of the worlds news propoganda machines. He supports Hillary (I have No idea why) but i have made my decision by observing the power of propoganda....
2007-03-10 17:02:54
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Castro and vice-Pres. Hugo. It is obvious in California that Republicans and Democrats are both useless. If this world is ever to be healed it will need a one world party.
2007-03-10 17:03:12
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋