English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Building 7 was a fine example of fire controlled demolition. They could save heaps of cash

2007-03-10 08:23:10 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events Current Events

13 answers

It doesn't work as the skyscraper in Seville Spain proved in 2003...it burned for 18 days and is still standing. 2000 DEGREE FUEL FIRE DOESN'T MELT STEEL you boobs. The only three steel framed buildings to be brought down by fire in history are WTC 1, 2 and 7. Guess what they too were brought down by explosives.

2007-03-10 08:46:45 · answer #1 · answered by Perry L 5 · 0 1

Controlled demolition was not used on 9/11.

2007-03-10 08:32:35 · answer #2 · answered by robot_hooker 4 · 1 1

Wasn't it because of the way the twin towers were designed? I thought the external walls of the twin towers carried all the weight, so when the walls were breached, the weight of upper floors pressed downwards.

If the planes had gone into the Empire State Building it would not have collapsed.

2007-03-10 08:29:28 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

The twin towers had so much jet fuel to burn off, which would not save heaps of cash

2007-03-10 08:32:41 · answer #4 · answered by element_op 3 · 0 1

If they have a way of getting the fuel up there without the loss of life, sounds good to me, but then again you have all these environmental freaks to contend with

2007-03-10 19:47:21 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Air pollution would be awful - can't imagine residents near by would be too happy about it not to mention the Ozone layer. Plus fire is very hard to control.

2007-03-10 08:30:14 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

It's much less dangerous because it can be controlled more easily, it's more predictable, and most steel structures will hold up to fire

2007-03-10 08:31:58 · answer #7 · answered by MLBfreek35 5 · 2 0

Was Building 7 a.... 'fine example?'.
Why don't you go to Pakistan and learn the trade A**hole!?.

2007-03-10 08:37:36 · answer #8 · answered by JohnH(UK) 3 · 0 1

Blasting is far easier to control which is important when there are other structures close by....and it's incredible to watch.

2007-03-10 08:26:53 · answer #9 · answered by nin 5 · 1 0

LMao ... obviously most these guys don't watch 24 ..


Not saying it did happen .. but it could


Dr Bad

2007-03-10 08:53:39 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers