are you for or against bush as a president?

Answer 1

AGAINST!

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1mcqGmTgruE&mode=related&search=

Answer 2

Against

Answer 3

I respect the office of the President of the United States.

I oppose Bush and almost all his actions and policies.

You know, you could just go to www.rasmussen.com, or to another polling site, and get basic info on public opinion about Bush, if that's what you're after.

Answer 4

I never was for President Bush. I thought he was a much better choice than Al Gore. I was sick of the left's desire to tax every working person out of existence. They also would not shut up about racism. They labeled every person in America as a racist. I lived through eight years of Bill Clinton's lunacy, and I was not ready for eight more. I did vote for Bush in 2000, but I didn't vote for him a second time. The whole Iraq War seemed sort of silly after 2003. There never was that much going on in Iraq. There were areas of violence in Iraq, but there was no civil war there. Jack Murtha was a total liar. I never cared that much about what was going on in Iraq. I thought the Iraqis should have been trained to take care of themselves. Bush used the situation in Iraq to make himself look like a hero. He was a hero for removing Saddam from power, but he should have let the Iraqis have control of Iraq. The only reason he kept sending U.S. soldiers there was because of the oil. I would have voted for Alan Keyes in 2000, but I knew the majority of Americans was not going to vote for him. I think Bin Laden had the most hatred for Bush because of his skin color. Bin Laden said he carried out the 9-11 attack because of Islam, but I think Bin Laden was also a racist bigot. 9-11 might have never happened if Keyes had been President, and Americans would have been able to listen to someone give great speeches. Bush is one of the worst public speakers. I am going to vote for Rudy Giuliani in 2008.

Answer 5

Im against, though im not american.
I'm lebanese, and it is because of his politics and his selfish interests and cruel actions and un necessary intervention are the main reason we are on the verge of a civil war: because of his sedision. He was partially the reason we had a war last summer, and i BLAME HIM for the war in Iraq, and the hostile and tension relantionship between Bush and Ahmadi Najad, + he's gonna be the MAIN reason for world war 3 (if there is one).

Answer 6

Definitely against! The whole thing was a scam right from the get go and only got worst!
"Mahal", what have you been smoking? Honestly, do you think only 3000 soliders have died in Iraq? It would be kind to say that figure is grossly understated!
Bush will join the crowd of "worst presidents in American history"- be assured!!!!!!!

Answer 7

Why should it matter? He's not the worst guy we could have as president. There was Hitler, after all. And then, he's not the best. He's certainly no Abe Lincoln. But what is going on with him in position isn't ENTIRELY his fault. The people of the states should have their votes and all and have their own say in things, which they do, if they'd vote. Um...

NEITHER

Answer 8

No. I'm usually never against any elected official unless they do something illegal or really, really dumb. Term limits are too restrictive for elected officials to do a lot of damage.

Bush and Rumsfeld have conducted the most successful war in American history (in terms of speed and casualties), and they're freeing millions of people from oppression.

Both of them are American heros just on that note.

Bush has also given us recovery from Clinton's recession and our economy will have much the same legacy as the one Reagan delivered to us in the late 80s.

Answer 9

Against. Based on the facts, morality, logic and reason.

There have been no valid arguments For Mr. Bush.

Answer 10

You're a little behind times there Bub. He is president for better or worse and it doesn't matter one way or the other if we like him or not these days.