I think there should be a trial for war crimes hat resulted from the fact that he and he alone ordered the US to invade Iraq without provocation or justification, and that civilians have been both accidentally and deliberately killed ever since.
If the court sentences him to hang, then so be it.
If there's going to be a lynching, he should be dropped off alone in Fallujah with only a bathrobe, a Bible, and a pair of Birkenstocks. If he makes it to either Jerusalem or Mecca on foot, he's free to go.
2007-03-10 06:16:09
·
answer #1
·
answered by oimwoomwio 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
Nope.
I don't think he should have ever been President, but since I respect the democratic process (for all its faults, since the US is not technically a democracy with its Electoral College and gerrymandering practices), I am stuck with him, therefore I make the best of the situation. It is easy to kill, but more of a challenge to change for the better. Besides, he isn't really a bad person, he's just not a very clever guy and he gets a lot of bad advice.
2007-03-10 15:36:21
·
answer #2
·
answered by lesroys 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
No.
None of the crimes he has admitted committing would merit that kind of punishment. Even the felonies (as defined by federal law) only merit a few years imprisonment per count.
18 USC 2511 (five years), 18 USC 1001 (5 years), 18 USC 2441 (discretionary term of years).
2007-03-10 14:05:40
·
answer #3
·
answered by coragryph 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
well, if we take on account that he went into a senseless war , he is spending billions of dollars a week from taxpayers money to fund the war, we have lost more than 3.000 troops in a guerilla war, U.S. have lost the respect from many countries, Latin american countries are becoming leftists(i.e. Hugo Chavez), a large majority of americans can't afford healtcare, and now everibody is starting to agree with the idea that 9/11 was an inside job to create a plice state, Yes I Think it is justified to hang him.
2007-03-10 14:17:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by P.O.W. 2
·
1⤊
2⤋
I am not a fan of Bush. I think he should never have been re elected and that the next president is going to have a huge mess to clean up after he is FINALLY gone!!!! The man is OUT OF CONTROL!!!!
2007-03-10 14:07:26
·
answer #5
·
answered by tara b 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
Only after being found guilty of treason and crimes against humanity by a high court.
2007-03-10 14:05:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
No to that question, and no to that type of question. It's only designed to raise the ire of the haters and defenders. I guess that's what you're after, though, huh.
2007-03-10 14:11:32
·
answer #7
·
answered by amazin'g 7
·
2⤊
0⤋
I am against the death penalty. For anyone. Life sentences are okay though.
2007-03-10 14:13:45
·
answer #8
·
answered by Eisbär 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
No. What for? Proactively protecting his country by striking first blow against islamic terrorists? Who have already struck at the heart of America killing thousands of Americans. Pity you liberals don`t appreciate what further horrors he may have saved you from.
2007-03-10 14:12:18
·
answer #9
·
answered by David H 6
·
2⤊
3⤋
I prefer to eat bush.
2007-03-10 14:06:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by guy o 5
·
2⤊
1⤋