2007-03-10 06:01:30 · 6 answers · asked by havegunwilltravel45 1 in Social Science ➔ Economics
The grass always appears greener on the other side of the fence.
If one percent of a moving-centered population decides to try out something new, is it such a big deal?
The economy is working fine. However some prefer to risk their lives in order to make the equivalent of ten days`wages in one day. IMO that is their choice. Some become cannon fodder to earn their families a pension of sorts. Some lose hands and arms to industrial accidents (on purpose) in order to get a large settlement and move back to a life of luxury (to them) maybe a small hotel out in the country. etc. etc.
Greed eventually destroys the greedy.
2007-03-10 06:19:39 · answer #1 · answered by canron4peace 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Economist do not really know why. Here is an interesting discussion of the problem.
http://www.marginalrevolution.com/marginalrevolution/2006/10/why_nhasnt_mexi.html
Slow growth and corruption and extreme income inequality seem to be linked, but sorting out cause and effect is hard.
2007-03-10 22:06:48 · answer #2 · answered by meg 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
They do not have a capitalist system.
Capitalist systems do not have large corrupt governments because governments are not large in a capitalist system.
.
2007-03-10 14:27:07 · answer #3 · answered by Zak 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No real resources. No stable industries. LOTS of coruption.
http://bigbucks.freehostia.com
2007-03-10 14:04:39 · answer #4 · answered by The Money Alchemist 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
they r underpaid and every1 wants to live the american dream
2007-03-10 14:05:00 · answer #5 · answered by Nate B 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
its not working b/c it is capitalism
2007-03-10 14:04:43 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋