Which do you find more appealing: self-reliance or government intervention?

Question

I prefer self-reliance

Answer 1

I find self-reliance much more appealing. It gives each person considerable strength that he/she could not get from government intervention. They develop integrity, courage, and motivation.

People develop a child-like dependence when they rely on a bloated bureocracy to meet their needs. And it feeds upon it self and gets worse as time goes on.

Answer 2

Morally I think everyone would agree for self reliance.

Realistically no nation is made of people who are completely self reliant. Some industries are better off int he hands of the government. Some nationalized industries can ease financial burden of the people, and provide for some real opportunity.

The United STates has been founded its empire by a mix of government and private individuals both working TOGETHER to kill and rob Natives and other established nations to better its own lot. NOT just one or the other. Realistically it's a very harmonic combined effort.

Answer 3

Definitely self-reliance. I'm willing to abide by the laws of the land, but it's my opinion that as we allow the government to intervene in our lives more and more, we lose the will and eventually the ability rely on ourselves.

Answer 4

Self-reliance, all you have to do is look at New Orleans, the government said they would help and the people are still waiting.

Answer 5

Self Reliance + a sprint greater advantageous yet not plenty I stick to the Jeffersonian theory: "much less government is greater effective government Why? -much less taxes -> persons can use their money plenty greater effective than the government EVER can... the greater money the government has the fewer useful they are with it and the greater corruption that comes out... No-bid contracting every physique?? -who's the ethical choose? -> Idk who's yet there is one element i be responsive to the government should not be it. you would be your guy or woman ethical choose or set your guy or woman ethical choose... specific basically to a undeniable quantity... no you may't pick to go around murdering human beings without effects in spite of if, the government could run some issues: faculties: it somewhat is somewhat important that we determine that the toddlers which will shop on our society be knowledgeable and smart Social amenities: the government could run the stuff like sewers, police, firemen, street artwork etc. protection: specific each and all the branches of the militia could be run by using the government simply by fact the government is the only making the determination if we visit conflict or not and if the government won't be able to administration the militia then we could desire to be ineffective very quickly i'm a Libertarian, in spite of if my own perspectives that positioned upon myself are very conservative in spite of if, who am I to rigidity my perspectives on you? those are my concepts on the priority, -TBird, a Libertarian

Answer 6

For most things, self-reliance.

The government is useful for a few limited things, where collective efforts are necessary to protect and benefit the entire society.

Roads, communications lines, emergency services (fire), law enforcement (police, criminal courts), maybe a military. Other than that, all government services should be optional.

If people want to pool their resources and get the benefit of "group rates" for services like welfare, insurance, health care, education, etc. -- more power to them. But those services should be optional, not compulsory.

Answer 7

I am awfully glad I don't need to be self relient when it comes to...heating my home, having a street to drive on, defending my home against foreign invaders, reading a book from the library, going to the park, and a whole host of goods and services provided by taxes, and, a fare and equitable government.

Answer 8

Me too.
If I had to wait on government to do things little would get done,too many commitees.
A Platapuss is an Animal designed by a commitee.

Answer 9

Absolutely self-reliance. Once you rely on the government to take care of your lazy ***, you surrender your civil liberties.

Answer 10

Most people will say self reliance but almost nobody (myself included) practice it anymore. We would rather buy from Walmart than support "self reliant" US companies or small companies that hire US citizens. We would rather collect welfare and depend upon affirmative action than do it (be self reliant) for ourselves.