http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070310/ap_on_go_ca_st_pe/us_iraq_troops
Pentagon struggles to find fresh troops
"Combat troops, meanwhile, are coming to realize that the Pentagon can't fulfill its commitment to give soldiers two years at home for every year they spend deployed."
2007-03-10 05:35:56 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Who says we are ignoring bin laden? Do you think tromping a few hundred thousand soldiers all over the world will find him any faster?
2007-03-10 05:38:37 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
An outgoing army General said last month that "deployment of the military was like a keg of beer, with the spicket at the top"...we need to work on deployment efficiency, for sure.
2007-03-10 05:42:07 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
osama bin encumbered is from kingdom of saudi arabia. bin encumbered team which has investments In united states of america belongs to his father. He grew to become into seen as a hero and a superb pal of united states of america till at last the taliban took over the afghanistan, while he defected to taliban area and shaped his team
2016-09-30 11:55:20 · answer #3 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You're using logic again....
The govt is operating on the blatant (and likely incorrect) assumption that the only terrorists in the world are in Iraq and Afghanistan. That's the whole "we're fighting them there so we don't have to fight them here" argument.
The problem with this assumption is that if there are any terrorists, or any other military threats, anywhere else in the world, we are stretched so thin that we couldn't respond.
Our only hope is that the terrorists don't realize this. {GASP} Oh my gods, I just emboldened the terrorists by revealing flaws in our govt's plan. We're all doomed....!
2007-03-10 05:41:28 · answer #4 · answered by coragryph 7 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Probably not too smart. But how smart would it be to pull out now and fight the terrorist here instead of over there?
Last I heard, we were making some excellent progress in Afghanistan, operation achilles.
2007-03-10 05:44:24 · answer #5 · answered by ric9757 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Thank You!
Bin Laden's been ignored because his daddy is friends with Bush's daddy. Long term business friends. You don't kill a friends kid. Not to mention, Bin Laden worked for us during the cold war. He spied on the Russians for us. That's why he's not dead. He was a scapegoat for this trajedy on 9/11. How do you people think we had a target so shortly after, It was announced the same day. Either we knew this was going to happen or we used him as a scape goat. I say the ladder.
2007-03-10 05:38:58 · answer #6 · answered by jpferrierjr 4 · 2⤊ 4⤋
Just proof that we America need the draft now,and that Bush and congress both like lies and untruths in large concentration...cant you smell the lies in the air..freepress,,three thumbs down oh goody ,now I know im right...I give this question a thumbs up..
2007-03-10 05:42:08 · answer #7 · answered by decider JR 3 · 0⤊ 3⤋
imo there is no problem .. if there was there would be a draft end of story ... and maybe thats what the stories in the media are preparing the public for especially if iran is attacked ...
2007-03-10 05:40:47 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
Not very. But then again, tell me something Bush has done that has been smart.
2007-03-10 05:47:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
NOT!!! Down with Dictator Dumbya!!!
2007-03-10 07:12:13 · answer #10 · answered by rhino9joe 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋