Now you will say, "My child is in a PUBLIC school." In which case I'm not getting a whole lot of bang for my buck because believe me, I'm paying the equivalent of a private school education for your child. Wouldn't your rather have a better teacher for your child than the babysitter who teaches him/her how to put a condom on a banana? Then lets phase out public education, give my tax dollars back, I'll put more in your paycheck (I'll want to keep you because you're valuable, right?) and then YOU can choose the best educator for your child. What do you think?
2007-03-10 04:01:17 · 14 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
You are right on brother! I have felt this way for years. I have four kids in the public education system. Only because after I pay all my taxes, I can not afford to send them to private school.
Other than the military, what has the federal government operated with any efficiency. The bigger problem is the damn teacher's union. They are more dangerous to our country than Alquiada (sp).
The other problem is that parents are not being parents therefore the schools (government) are raising our kids, teaching them sex ed and how to be a good nazi democrat.
As a military recruiter, I am in the local high schools all the time. We have a serious problem people.
Seems to me that we should still pay our education taxes, but eliminate the Dept of Ed which is nothing more than a huge bureaucracy that gobbles up most of the taxes collect for education. Our education system can only be saved if it is privatized and we are given education vouchers so we can choose which school to send our kids. You'd be amazed at how great a product you will get when competition is introduced to the market place. Think about it.
2007-03-10 04:08:50 · answer #1 · answered by ric9757 3 · 2⤊ 1⤋
If a public college isn't able to coach and accommodate an autistic toddler then in my opinion the county could could desire to pay for inner maximum coaching for the youngster. Autistic or not, each and every toddler has the terrific suited to get an coaching. If public faculties fail then inner maximum faculties could be tried. i don't think of the mothers and fathers or the college could take one-sided judgements approximately that however. i think of a nil.33 social gathering, a professional who focuses on autism (or in spite of alternative incapacity there is in touch), could evaluate the desires of the youngster and ensure no remember if the college is offering what's mandatory or no remember if yet another college could be greater effective waiting to fulfill the youngster's desires.
2016-10-18 01:02:03 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Wow I say file your tax forms!!! Because if a person sends their child to private school can deduct that off their taxes.
As for the Banana it's not happening. They are teaching abstinence in sex ed classes. If any school is failing to do that they get their federal funding cut. School don't want their funding cut.
What should be pointed out is that with schools teaching abstinence there has been a huge drop in teenage pregnancy.
2007-03-10 04:28:21 · answer #3 · answered by wondermom 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
If you send your child to a private school you still have to pay taxes for the public schools.
2007-03-10 04:04:53 · answer #4 · answered by Abu 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Yea that sounds like a great idea. all those poor kids loitering around because they can't afford to go to school. with unwanted babies because they got no sex education. I'm sure that will create a wonderful next generation. The "many children left behind" policy
why don't you go check our your neighborhood public school and see what's going on there instead of relying on rhetoric
2007-03-10 04:06:34 · answer #5 · answered by squeegie 3 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Nice in an ideal world but it won't work in our world. You will still have to pay for the private education of the child.
2007-03-10 04:06:37 · answer #6 · answered by cynical 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What education? I dropped my son off at his high school yesterday, and as we watched the kids cross the road I said "There goes our future leaders." We both had a good laugh.
2007-03-10 04:08:03 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
Sound good to me. There are too many people who think they a social obligation to educate all the turtle eggs that whore shlt out of their uterus'.
2007-03-10 04:14:08 · answer #8 · answered by F U 2 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
why should we end public education?
Thats a given for citizens because we value education.
if you want to do something good go fi up public schools- change the curriculum, get rid of trouble makers, ect
2007-03-10 04:23:08 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
We have a 99% adult literacy rate, at, a total expense for education, including private school spending, at about 5.6% of total U.S. GDP. Seems to be working now, mate.
2007-03-10 04:10:30 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋