Do you hate when WWE sometimes can't decide who should win between big stars, so they have someone interfere?

Question

This is one of the biggest things that bothers me about the WWE. Sometimes when they have to big-time wrestlers facing, you can tell, they can't decide who should be the winner so they have one or the other cheat, they have someone interfere, or they have it end in a really lame way, or some way that isn't fair. I mean, if they can't decide and they think both of the wrestlers are big, why have the match anyway. I was just watching some of the Undertaker vs. Bret Hart matches and they never had one match where the ending wasn't lame and they had someone interfere because they can't decide who the winner is going to be. It's really irritating to because, the matches are really long so, it's like, 'wow! you're going to have this great of a match and then you're going to ruin it by having it end this way?' Thanx to the WWE's indecision, we will never truly know whose gimmick was the better man. It was the same way with Undertaker and Shawn Michaels throughout the 90s. Because the athletes

were so big, they would never pick a winner. And it was kind of a rip-off because these were pay-per-view matches that the WWE made it's fans pay for and I paid for a lot of them because I thought these would be great matches, only to have them ruin it with the totally lame endings where someone always cheats because they can't decide which big star to win. Why have them face if you cant' decide. These are main event matches on pay-per-views where things are supposed to be settled once and for all and the WWE is going to rip everyone off. That is why I don't by pay-per-views these days because of what they used to do.

don't have big fan-faves face each other if u can't decide

Answer 1

YES I HATE THAT SO MUCH IT ANNOYS ME!!!

I AGREE WITH U SO MUCH



fan since 1999

Answer 2

I completely agree. It can be seen even now. Remember the match between Kurt Angle and Undertaker on the SD after last year's No Way Out? It was an incredible match that ended with Mark Henry interfering. Or how about the first RVD vs. Lashley match on ECW. They ended it a no contest because RVD made a little botch. These matches rocked, but their endings sucked.

Answer 3

That became into my prediction. the super teach would not actually have a tournament and he's been aside of this storyline via the entire element, constantly interfering whilst they attempt to attempt against. there is even a wager that huge teach will attack Cena until now the bell jewelry and all Miz will would desire to do is pin him. I see Miz easily triumphing, yet i recognize for a actuality massive teach will play a huge section in his win (no pun meant, lol).

Answer 4

I just hate it when WWE keeps the same belt on the same damn undeserving guy over the past year and a half.

And yeah I don't like it either but it has to be done to build up to a PPV. And if those finishes ARE on a PPV then they prolly wanna keep the belt around someone.

Answer 5

Dude. You have to realize...Vince does this stuff for the ratings. It keeps you watching doesn't it? When you watch a WWE match up just keep in mind your guy will probably be screwed and deal with it cuz McMahon is a jerk.

Answer 6

yes i totally agree. but sometimes it adds to the suspicion. like wrestlemania u really think the animal will defeat the deadman single handily? or taker defeat him without anybody holding grudges over him(eg- mr.Kennedy,mark Henry)

Answer 7

Yes I hate that they are so indecisive and it just makes me sick. Sometimes the match ups just don't make any sense.

Answer 8

Yeah I think that probally pisses everyone off.

Answer 9

That is annoying but sometimes you can see that coming.

Answer 10

I TOTALY AGREE MAN>> IT GETS ON my nerves when they do that