She is not pretty, she was a little better in younger days but now she seems to have that sort of long "skinny horsey face" that does not become her at all. Her acting is pretty good, but she is not there because of looks. Take away all the professional hair and make up folk and I doubt you would pay attention to her on the streets.
2007-03-10 06:22:01
·
answer #1
·
answered by TheatreFan 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
To me, she was attractive when she was younger (anyone else remember "Girls Just Want To Have Fun"?) but as she has gotten older she has lost more and more weight with the result that she looks far too bony in the face, which gives her that unfortunate resemblance to a horse. It's a pity that these actresses feel the need to conform to the skinny ideal. Oh well, I'm going to keep on enjoying my food and not giving a crap what fashion or the media tells me. (It's one of the few benefits of ageing in my opinion!)
2007-03-10 11:02:49
·
answer #2
·
answered by lululaluau 5
·
1⤊
0⤋
I wouldn't say she is ugly, but she certainly is not beautiful in my opinion either! I think she just falls into the normal range for attractiveness. If she ever does look a little more than attractiveness it appears to me that it is a result of a lot of make-up and air brushing!!
2007-03-10 10:58:35
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
There are uglier women than SJP...and prettier. I don't care how she looks like, I'm a big fan of Sex and the City, but it's true she would look better if she put some weight on.
2007-03-10 11:46:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by La 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Neighhhhhhh
2007-03-10 10:56:16
·
answer #5
·
answered by heynow 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Beauty is in the eye of the beholder. I think that she is definitely unique looking and her quirky sense of style helps her stand out in a crowd. So to some people being unique is beautiful so she has it!
2007-03-10 11:01:45
·
answer #6
·
answered by Rebekah B 3
·
3⤊
0⤋
I dont know what it is about her, I think her face is just too wide or something. she looks pretty some days and then the rest of the time she's...not pretty
2007-03-10 10:56:52
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
beauty is in the eye of the beholder - I have to admit I never 'saw' her as others do, not ugly but cetrainly not a beauty in my eyes.
2007-03-10 10:58:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by torbrexbones 4
·
1⤊
0⤋
i wouldn't call her ugly, but i wouldn't call her pretty either. she has a natural looking aura about her, but it doesn't make her gorgeous. i think the people who do think she is pretty just like her from her role in sex in the city.
2007-03-10 11:44:27
·
answer #9
·
answered by I'm Smiling Hapy 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
This totally depends on your definition of beauty!
2007-03-10 12:39:37
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋