or kicking out Tony and letting the Queen run the country ?
if they were the only two choices we had .
2007-03-10 01:53:07 · 8 answers · asked by keny 6 in Politics & Government ➔ Other - Politics & Government
don`t tempt me DR O i can live without yet another violation
2007-03-10 02:18:48 · update #1
What titles will you suggest for a Bushman and his wife ?
2007-03-10 02:06:49 · answer #1 · answered by Dr.O 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Honestly, the queen would do a better job at running the country.
BUT, I doubt that the other members of the royal family would do as good. That would be a problem.
2007-03-10 11:17:29 · answer #2 · answered by Sarah* 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Keep the Queen but remember what you read in the history books, serf.
2007-03-10 09:57:38 · answer #3 · answered by MANCHESTER UK 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
We tried letting the monarch run the country and fought a bloody civil war to remove power from them and create a government. I do not think either option is desirable. Best to stick with what we've got.
2007-03-10 09:58:03 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
I'd go for the queen.
2007-03-10 09:59:20 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
the queen any day
2007-03-10 10:28:18 · answer #6 · answered by lailani 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Keep royalty and burn the false pretender......if I had the choice
2007-03-10 11:24:55 · answer #7 · answered by I'm Sparticus 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
long live the queen
(Elizabeth that is)
2007-03-10 10:07:27 · answer #8 · answered by lola 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋