Archaeologists get your hands off dem bones. Do you agree?

Question

Do you agree with me that peoples graves should be left along however old they are as a sign of respect. Do Archaeologists really need to dig up graves and disrupt a persons wishes just to further their knowledge?

Mrs Bad Angry

sorry I said left along instead of left alone

~(*¿*)~ Yes I do think it matter what people think. Perhaps it might even ignite someone who is in the know into action. I in fact think that words are sometimes like smiles and have a knock on effect.

~(*¿*)~ Yes I do think it matters what people think. Perhaps it might even ignite someone who is in the know into action. I in fact think that words are sometimes like smiles and have a knock on effect.

Answer 1

Both betty and I have discussed this after watching lots of Time Team, and we both have said it seems very disrepectful to the people who have died. Yes their spirits and souls are in a happier place but even in our cemetary I will plodge through lots of mud instead of crossing a grave.

Give the dead some respect I say

Answer 2

Yeah, I agree to a certain extent. Reputable scientists do get all the proper permission in order before they do that; to make sure they aren't offtending a particular family or an entire group of people. For example, Native American burial grounds are off limits most the time because Native Americans have complained about scientists doing that in the past.

Answer 3

some actual trust he did not exist. Discovery channel? My expertise there replaced into references to "the instructor" yet those might want to were yet another instructor. Press releases of the time that would want to have said Jesus' execution made no factor out of it, suggesting that the Crucifixion might want to were an invention. different historians advise, Jesus replaced into areal individual yet Mary Magdalene replaced into bankrolling Jesus and she might want to were the authentic chief of the early "christian" church. it truly is besides the undeniable fact that a stretch to trust the miracles etc were no longer merely fairy thoughts. i pick to position self assurance in my own own miracles yet authentic miracles that bypass muster with the skeptics society are difficult to discover as we talk and there is a sturdy danger that some embellishing might want to have taken position. E.g. Mary and Joseph might want to no longer have slept walked one evening to cudddle lower than the celebs, and dreampt God had finished the deed with Mary. Or Joseph might want to have snuck in claiming to be an angel. Or Mary might want to have lied about being a virgin. contained in the OT the note used meant youthful youngster. In New testomony greek note for virgin replaced into used. The OT note replaced into comparable to todays use of maiden. I.e a youthful woman probable a virgin. as we talk maximum childrens are presumed by their mum and dad to be virgins yet maximum of them are having sex. Biblical situations might want to have not been so distinct.

Answer 4

I am an archaeology student and have a love of ancient history and past cultures; however, I wholly agree with you.

Answer 5

aye how would an archaeologist like it if someone dug up any of their dead ancestors

Answer 6

um...i think it's alright ...i mean...if it wernt for them digging up the bones of different stuff, like dinosaurs or phaeroas

Answer 7

Does it really matter what I think? or what anyone else on here thinks?