Please DON'T generalize. I am a conservative and I find this behavior deplorable. I have never liked Newt and I think he needs to go away. I will not defend him nor anyone who behaves like that regardless of political ideology.
2007-03-08 23:34:34
·
answer #1
·
answered by Truth B. Told ITS THE ECONOMY STUPID 6
·
5⤊
1⤋
Apparently not! Have you ever read the book glass houses? It tells all about the horrendous crimes against the people, that all these people who were persecuting Clinton, committed. No one is saying that Clinton was a saint by any stretch of the imagination, but he should never been asked that question in the first place. No one had any right to ask him any questions that personal, under oath or other wise. And for those who think that a lie under oath is worse than any other lie, you need to get some real morals. A lie is a lie, regardless whether it is under oath or not. It is far more important what is being lied about, than whether the lie is under oath or not. Too many times I have heard some of you people excusing someone else's lie, because it was not under oath, and saying that a lie about a bj is worse, simply because it was under oath. That is just plain stupid. The only way to really determine which lie is worse, is to look at who, the lie harmed, and how many people the lie harmed. .
2007-03-09 00:17:07
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
i could favor to make certain a Republican run who could have economic discipline and in no way want the organization global. it truly is alright to shrink spending on social courses if that funds isn't re-directed in route of company welfare. I voted for Obama and am registered as a Dem, besides the undeniable fact that; i'm starting up to consider even if he's conscious what the hell he's doing. I wish bill Clinton were in place of work as we talk because he's conscious the commercial equipment like the again of his hand. I gained't vote for Gingrich or Palin. For me to flow party strains and vote GOP, that they had could placed someone up who's dedicated to innovation and lowering prices of potential, well being care, training etc. i do not assume any handouts and in no way have, i desire my authorities to handle the topic matters of the day and make united statesa. the innovator that we were in the course of the gap age. also the middle classification needs genuine everlasting tax alleviation. i could favor to make certain the 28% flow to 20-5% and the 25% to 20%, too usually the undesirable and the prosperous get the massive breaks and the guy who is going to school would not get the breaks he/she advantages for all their dedication and labor.
2016-12-05 11:07:09
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Newt the moral crusader of the 1990''s what his affair part of the Contract with America?
2007-03-09 00:02:47
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Newt was not under oath when asked about it. Clinton is a big liar for more reasons than Monica-gate also. Libs are the KINGS and QUEENS of hypocrisy. Also, I knew about Newt's affair for a long time now.....hardly news to me.
2007-03-08 23:18:15
·
answer #5
·
answered by Johnny Conservative 5
·
4⤊
4⤋
The actual affair was never really the issue (although the images of it were quite funny). The issue was that Clinton told people to lie under oath. Clinton also addressed the American people on the subject and LIED his *** off. He would have been better off to have said "Oops, I messed up."
2007-03-08 23:15:58
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
4⤊
4⤋
If you opened a book or did even the smallest amount of reading on this subject, you would know that President Clinton was not being investigated for having an affair, but for obstructing justice during the whitewater investigation.
2007-03-08 23:13:21
·
answer #7
·
answered by webbrew 4
·
4⤊
6⤋
Who's defending?!? All politicians are crooked. I'd rather defend Monica than any of 'em (and I can't stand her - She's a total slut). Have a nice day :-)
2007-03-08 23:13:57
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
2⤋
Democrats, Republicans.
Same stink, different pile
2007-03-08 23:20:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
3⤋
You must be very scared of Newt. You are still defending all the slime in your party and trying to tell republicans it is wrong for them to do the same. Republicans usually boot their slime, democrats reelect them.
2007-03-08 23:15:02
·
answer #10
·
answered by Tommy G. 5
·
7⤊
5⤋