you raise an interesting point
as with your respondants i say no they cannot ,but it is a fact that they are the only ones who are,
witness the high death rate of our media ,where are thier protections when even the judiciary are cowerd
god bless those who present the truths in the face of colluded advantage , oh that the constitutional protections extended to protecting the right of reporters to be nosey
but there are not ,any powerfull elite exploiting the many loop holes has more protections than those wonderfull few who see evil and try to expose it
oh that public servants persued those exploiting this so called constitutional farce
sadley there are more reporters in heaven than lawyers and polititions combined
even then how often the reporters stopped and the media dosnt pick up the why of what was being investigated and via murder shut down ,any reporters death should be a red flag that brings in the big guys ,but the big guns are serving thier masters
2007-03-09 16:01:04
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Who is going to hold the media accountable for their "investigations".
Media has already demostrated they have no moral standard or accountablity.
They are after a 30 second sound bite to for their audience.
So the answer is NO.
2007-03-08 23:52:56
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Absolutely not!Any screw ball with a camera,pen,computer,and money can be a journalist.Albeit probably a horrible journalist,but a journalist none the less.I personally wouldn't want someone like this determining my fate.Then again they might be wacky enough to let you off if you acually did do something worthy of a penalty.
2007-03-08 23:54:22
·
answer #3
·
answered by james i 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Can't replace and shouldn't replace too. It would be travesty of justice. Remeber media is also not above board. They say the man with money makes the news
2007-03-08 23:24:40
·
answer #4
·
answered by surnell 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
no,it cant,and it shouldn't,but it can certainly help in bringing good issues in limelight .
2007-03-09 14:11:55
·
answer #5
·
answered by yuvraj S 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
so you have a problem with the Constitution?
2007-03-08 23:19:56
·
answer #6
·
answered by webbrew 4
·
0⤊
0⤋