2007-03-08 21:37:49 · 17 answers · asked by sylvie c 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes that is why he is leaving office soon... I think sometime this month from the last I heard. I could be wrong on that in that it seems to change constantly...
2007-03-09 14:54:17 · answer #1 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have, him and his mate Brown the Tax Man.
I think that if Mr Blair was a decent man he would announce the general election as his last departing act and let the public vote who they want in charge.
A definite no vote for Brown from me.
2007-03-12 22:24:37 · answer #2 · answered by Moneyloser 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I have - he should have gone months and months ago when it became clear that the premise for the invasion of Iraq was false, in fact falsified. However the slimey bastard wriggled through 4 enquiries and beat the DG @ BBC as well.
Its a shame really because prior to 9/11 he was doing a good job.
2007-03-10 12:51:24 · answer #3 · answered by Moebious 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
YES!! I don't know about everyone else , but i think we need a prime minister who can make his own desisions instead following george bush just because he's the president of america...like the war in iraq there was absolutley no reason why we had to join the fight. it's not our problem. tony blair and george bush can both just run off & die!
2007-03-09 04:10:09 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋
Not all Britain, no. There is still about 18% of the population who stubbornly refuse to see how utterly corrupt, delusional and incompetent he really is. But the vast majority of Brits have finally come to realise that he is not fit for purpose.
Unfortunately our biased voting system means that labour require far fewer votes to keep power, than are required by other parties to wrestle power away from them.
I believe that this imbalance is part of the cause of their total arrogance. It's like Labour are saying, "OK Britain, what are you going to do about us? it will take a miracle for us to be voted out of power, so tough! You have no choice but to comply."
The problem is, Cameron has utterly and cravenly caved in to the politically correct lobby by destroying the career and reputation of an outstanding former army officer, (who did more to rid the army of racism than most, as those who worked closely with him can attest to) as a knee-jerk sop to the PC lobby, and so, is not worth voting for,.
The Lib dems would hand labour power as soon as there was a hung Parliament.
Right now, UKIP are looking like the only option worth voting for.
2007-03-08 21:53:09 · answer #5 · answered by kenhallonthenet 5 · 4⤊ 2⤋
Blair had long been admired by Britain but hated by terrorists.
2007-03-08 21:48:34 · answer #6 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 3⤊ 3⤋
im not even from britain and ive had enough of blair
2007-03-08 21:58:38 · answer #7 · answered by Ⓐ iinux2 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Is the Pope catholic?
N.B Should the answer to a question be a resounding and unequivical "YES", then a reply to the question is;
'Is the pope catholic?'
2007-03-11 05:11:23 · answer #8 · answered by Devil's Advocate 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Not only UK, the hole world.
Bush and Blair of!!!
Their people that they want 2 live same more years.
Am yang to die because of them !!!!
2007-03-08 21:41:59 · answer #9 · answered by iona 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
No, that's why he won the last general election.
2007-03-09 06:10:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋