I think it's missing a verb, and ''till'' isn't really the right word.
2007-03-08 21:31:22
·
answer #1
·
answered by dutchday 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
Try this -
"Self hate breeds self hate for there is nothing left but hate."
Self hate starts from hate and when you get thrown into the self hate cycle - you think there is nothing but hate every where. It is kinda of like the chicken and the egg. Once, you reach a certain point - it doesn't matter which cam first - your there. So, your statement is about the arrival not the starting point, but it fools you into thinking it is about the starting point. But just because you arrive - does not mean there is not a positive departure coming your way. So, it is not about the end either.
2007-03-08 21:59:23
·
answer #2
·
answered by karadansu 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
It might depend on whether you mean self hate breeds more self hatred in oneself or that self hate breeds more self hatred in others until there is nothing left but hate for each other.
I am not so sure you can hate something more...similar to love...either you love something or you don't....you hate yourself or don't...So in the first instance I would argue that it does not make sense.
There is the expression that you must love yourself before you love others. Perhaps you could argue that if you hate yourself you will hate others. Therefore, in the second instance, our self hatred or self loathing, if expressed, might influence others to feel the same way. If we all hate ourselves then it would be argued that we all hate each other as well.
2007-03-08 21:44:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by Michael L 1
·
0⤊
1⤋
If you hate 'yourself' long enough you will then turn and hate everything/everyone else in life. You then turn into a miserable crab that hates being alive. Just as love breeds love. Pity breeds pity etc.
2007-03-08 22:05:00
·
answer #4
·
answered by missellie 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
it should probably read: Self hate breeds self hate until there is nothing left but hate!@~
2007-03-09 05:01:48
·
answer #5
·
answered by nswblue 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
properly, it truly is smart, besides the undeniable fact that it has room for progression. attempt: "we are no longer defined by technique of the mistakes we make; quite we are defined by technique of how we make certain to address mistakes even as they take position." once you're questioning what the sentance is meant to signify, as hostile to the way it will be worded otherwise, i have self belief what it truly is attempting to assert is that, making mistakes would not outline us, it truly is our reaction to the mistakes that tells who we truly are. someone who makes a mistake and walks away is amazingly diverse from someone who sticks round and tries to fix it. someone who fixes it by technique of being proactive is amazingly diverse from someone who sits round worring about what has got here about and yet does no longer something. i do not understand if the 2d area became what you've been searching for, yet i wanted to hide all my bases. i wish this enables.
2016-12-05 11:05:27
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
perfect sense. In fact it makes more sense than, your first question "what does this mean"?
Just keep asking, i like to answer.
2007-03-08 21:55:41
·
answer #7
·
answered by michelebaruch 6
·
0⤊
0⤋
That makes perfect sense. It's very true.
2007-03-08 21:40:27
·
answer #8
·
answered by Hello 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Yea, a similar situation would be something like.....people who are so absorbed in themselves who can't think past themelves become the monster that they are. something like that...does that make sense to you?
2007-03-08 22:21:11
·
answer #9
·
answered by simplesimon 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Perfect sense to me.
2007-03-08 21:30:26
·
answer #10
·
answered by Im Listening 5
·
1⤊
0⤋