i woudn't.
2007-03-08 20:09:11 · 27 answers · asked by Piggy 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
I do have the ability to count stars, and I was just doing it when your question interrupted me, where was I?
7,899,999,999
7,900,000,000
7,900,000,001
7,900,000,002
2007-03-08 20:12:52 · answer #1 · answered by Laura Palmer 5 · 3⤊ 0⤋
No because by the time you got done counting, you would be wrong. With all of the shooting stars and old stars burning out and new ones forming all of the time, the number would have changed by the time you got done counting.
2007-03-08 20:14:07 · answer #2 · answered by Deadhead Incognito 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well that is the difference between you and i. I am driven and would try to count the all stars. However, i would pick an overcast night in which to do it; what do you think i dont have a life, sheesh. I mean come on. I have better things to do, like Yahoo Answers. ;)
2007-03-08 21:28:29 · answer #3 · answered by roncho 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I won't count the stars, it's to hard for me. But at 7.30pm on 31 March 2007 I will be looking at stars.
2007-03-08 22:04:32 · answer #4 · answered by Yūsuke 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Obviously not. Its a waste of time besides there are just too many stars to begin with.
2007-03-08 20:13:33 · answer #5 · answered by SGElite 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Only the major ones.
2007-03-08 20:16:27 · answer #6 · answered by Judas Rabbi 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
well you have 3 so far (including mine)
you can't count the stars in the sky without thinking of lucy's diamonds
2007-03-08 22:47:43 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 1⤋
Nope, but I've heard you have a friend in Sesame Street who does that every night. Ah, ah, ah!
2007-03-08 20:12:54 · answer #8 · answered by Groucho Returns 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I have more better things to do with my time..this is a waste of effort as whats the use?
2007-03-08 20:12:03 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Me neither. I would probably get bored after the first 1000.... lol
2007-03-08 20:14:19 · answer #10 · answered by Sunrise 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋