The statement is:
a. True
b. False
c. Neither
2007-03-08 18:35:09 · 8 answers · asked by Gumby Speed Racer 1 in Education & Reference ➔ Higher Education (University +)
Because the same Slicks that are also Wicks may not be the same Slicks that are also Snicks, we can draw no firm conclusions from the information given that there is a direct relationship between Snicks and Wicks. It is possible that some Wicks may also be Snicks, but you cannot correctly make the statement "some Wicks are definitely Snicks." Therefore, answer option "B," or False, is the right answer.
2007-03-08 19:13:38 · update #1
False only if they said all wicks are slicks then it would be true, or if they said all slicks are snikes. The sets are not mutually exhaustive
2007-03-08 19:08:46 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
C. Neither
Only SOME Wicks are Slicks
And SOME Slicks are Snicks
It is POSSIBLE for SOME Wicks to be Snicks, but not necessarily so... more info would be needed to determine... ; )
Are you doing that online IQ test??? ; )
2007-03-08 18:41:22 · answer #2 · answered by HJ 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
definitely A
2007-03-08 19:08:01 · answer #3 · answered by R.S. 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
A True. But they don't go around blabbing it to everybody, you know.
2007-03-08 18:45:13 · answer #4 · answered by James M 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
True
2007-03-08 18:38:29 · answer #5 · answered by x_ampz_x 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
LOL omg no idea sorry =]
2007-03-08 18:38:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
d. it depends
2007-03-08 18:38:09 · answer #7 · answered by scruffycat 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
true.
2007-03-08 18:37:41 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋