You are dumb.
2007-03-08 18:40:10
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
8⤊
3⤋
I looked into the "evidence" to support the fact that 9/11 was an inside job. The evidence that was presented took too many liberties and had little or no factual basis. I don't think 9/11 was an inside job, and no plausible evidence has been presented to prove contrary. Many people like the idea of complex conspiracies for the same reason they enjoy a good spy novel. On the other hand, I believe that many others support the inside job theory for the sole purpose of finding a poor reason to take a shot at the Bush administration. If some believable evidence comes forth then I'm sure I'll change my views, but it doesn't look like that will happen.
2007-03-09 02:52:53
·
answer #2
·
answered by Joe G 1
·
4⤊
2⤋
Do you have a credible source for your accusation?
And no, I am not talking about YouTube, conspiracytheories.net, or even Bushdidit.org!
No?
Well, there are a number of credible sources that document exactly how ludicrous your "conspiracy theories" are.
As a start, why don't you visit the sources I will provide you below? I know it is more fun to believe in the fantasy, but why not give reality a try for a change?
2007-03-09 10:37:48
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
Neither one. When someone shows me proof beyond twisted theories on conspiracy theory.orgs that make any sense at all, I'll be more than willing to investigate it. Every charge the conspiracy people make has been explained ad nauseum. But you do as you are accusing others of doing, you don't want to know you're wrong and that amounts to fear. Something about conspiracy theorists is fascinating - they seem to need the kick that gives them, like an addict with the urge. None of you, not a one, has made any points that haven't been answered and explained, and when you make silly statements like there were no planes, when others clearly saw them; and (this is my favorite) there were no people on those planes, though many cell phones were used from the planes and recorded by the cell phone companies, not to mention all the relatives who have talked publicly about their loss, you all start to seem more than a little bit nutty. So no, it's not laziness, or fear, but more in the line of dismissal and a desire not to waste time on nonsense.
2007-03-09 02:52:26
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
3⤋
People who refuse to accept the fact that the U.S. Government had their hand in the Terror Attacks of 911 are ignorant. It's impossible for Jet fuel or Kerosene to melt iron. Also if the floors collapsed causing a chain reaction it would have taken well over 90 seconds for the buildings to come down. They came down at free fall speed....9 seconds. There is no logical argument here. Explosives were pre-planted in the building. Some will argue that the fires were raging hot inferno’s...however if that was the case then why were there people standing in the holes where the planes impacted waving for help? Their clothes weren’t even burnt.
Here we are talking about the biggest crime scene in the history of the United States...and what did Guilani do? He scooped up all the evidence and got rid of it as fast as he possibly could. Sent overseas to be recycled? I doubt it...my guess is they dumped it all in the middle of the Atlantic Ocean.
If people would for one second look at the evidence...it's a common tactic for a country to injure or attack itself and then blame it on the enemy. Then we can go get em. There is even a name for it...it’s called.. “Pretext for Military Intervention” Why doesn’t someone tell me why NORAD didn't scramble any fighters to escort the hijacked planes down? They didn't miss 1, but all 4!! Anytime a commercial airline goes off course without explanation, within 10 minutes, fighter jets are supposed to escort them down. Especially the air space over the Pentagon! Hmmm. How convenient. You think it was because Bush ordered Cheney to take control over NORAD the same morning of the attacks? Did you also know that the WTC changed owners about six months prior to the attacks? Did you know that the buildings were worth more if destroyed than standing? That Larry Silverstein is the man who cashed out on the scam...walking away with billions? Did you know that there was a flurry of activity on Wall Street prior to the attacks, and the majority of the trading was “Put options” on the doomed Airlines stock? Did you know that there were multiple explosions heard inside the buildings from all kinds of firefighters, police officers and witnesses? Did you know that WTC Building 7 fell at approximately 5:30 p.m.? That the building did not suffer any major damage, but it somehow blew up into a fine pile of dust? Does anyone know what propaganda is? Do you know that it is also a well known and effectively used tool for the government to pull the wool over your eyes? Well, don't say we didn't warn you when your asking yourself 5 years from now "How could this happen?" Educate yourself and open your eyes folks. This is real, and there are more than just a couple of us who think so. Go to Google and type in Terror Attacks of 911...have yourself a look at all the choices there are to choose from.
2007-03-09 03:42:12
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
4⤋
Believe me, I care about the truth.
That it was an inside job hasnt been proven. Dont jump to conclusions. I agree that the evidence seems to point to that conclusion, but still, nothing is definitive.
Keep an open mind, always.
2007-03-09 02:49:10
·
answer #6
·
answered by Jesus W. 6
·
3⤊
1⤋
Neither. I don't care that it was an inside job because I don't accept the premise.
2007-03-09 04:26:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by phoenixbard2004 3
·
2⤊
0⤋
Come on man...this isn't a way to engage people. Although i do believe it was an inside job you can't just say it is as a MATTER OF FACT.
There are healthier ways to ask questions that could make people THINK....this question makes people react defensively because its accusatory.
2007-03-09 02:47:46
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
Because it wasn't. The "evidence" that the towers were blown up by the government is all fake. Fake fake fake. Muslim terrorists hijacked jumbo jets and crashed them into the world trade center, that's a fact. Dozens of people saw an airplane crashing into the pentagon, not a missile. It was only by chance that the first plane was video taped crashing into the wtc. If it hadn't, the conspiracy theory nuts would be saying it was a missile, too.
2007-03-09 02:48:12
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
3⤊
4⤋
Dang Conspirators
2007-03-09 02:37:08
·
answer #10
·
answered by Die Hard Patriot 2
·
4⤊
2⤋
In order to believe it wasn't an inside job...in order to believe that those buildings were not brought down by controlled demolition, you have to believe that 120 stories came down, approximately 12 stories per second all on their own. There is just no way!!! It is the official story that doesn't make any sense.!!!!!! I do care, of course, but I guess the implications are too much for some people to handle.!!!!
2007-03-09 03:41:58
·
answer #11
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋