The grammar is not as troublesome as the excess verbiage. Try: "Foreign investment in the country was $2 million in 2006, down from $3 million in 2005." Neat and clean.
2007-03-08 18:35:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
The country's foreign investment realized in 2006 was US$2 million. However, this amount was a decrease from the 2005 investment, which was US$3 million.
2007-03-09 02:38:33
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Foreign investment in the country, that had been realized in 2006, was US $2 million. However, this amount decreased compared to that in 2005, reaching US $3 million.
Personally I'd use
In 2006, Foreign investment in the country was US $2 million. However, compared to US $3 million in 2005, this amount decreased.
2007-03-09 02:32:52
·
answer #3
·
answered by Ian B 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Foreign investment in the country, that had been realized in 2006, was US$2 million. However, this amount decreased compared to that in 2005, when it was US$ 3 million.
2007-03-09 02:30:28
·
answer #4
·
answered by ignoramus 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
What I would write is as follows:
Foreign investment in the country had been calculated to be US$2 million in 2006.. However, this amount decreased compared to that in 2005 which reached US$ 3 million.
I didnt agree with how your first sentence was written so I changed it. I put "reached" cuz you are talking about the past.
2007-03-09 02:33:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by R.S. 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Short sentence? Looks like 2 confusing sentences. How about:
Foreign investment realized in the country in 2006 was US$2 million which was less than the US$3 million reached in 2005.
Note: I just read the guys sentence above me... his is better than mine.
2007-03-09 02:36:34
·
answer #6
·
answered by theegorider 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
'has been realized' may very well be replaced by "was realized" !
2007-03-09 09:32:04
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
had
2007-03-09 02:47:38
·
answer #8
·
answered by Manz 5
·
0⤊
1⤋