if we leave now, that will be the result
2007-03-08 16:01:27 · 16 answers · asked by WJ 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
I just think they are naive enough to believe we somehow are provoking Iran. I do not think the media has done a good job of connecting the dots for Americans. Saddam kept Iran out. Saddam was committing genocide. We took out Saddam. Now we are keeping radical Islam (Iran and Hezbollah) from establishing a strong-hold in Iraq, so Iraq can establish its own military.
I think if we leave now, WWIII will result.
2007-03-08 16:32:18 · answer #1 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
WHEN we leave... that will be the result...
free elections is a GREAT idea in an area where the majority of the population is sympathetic to Iran...
another genius Republican move... classic
so... how much do you want to spend over how many years that will make your taxes to go up to make sure that doesn't happen?
2007-03-08 16:23:32 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
So, you think it's the US obligation to intervene any time one country might invade another, but only if we don't like who the invader is?
Then again, during the initial US invasion, and for quite a while afterward, Iran was controlled by a progressive, Western-learning, secular government who had strong ties with other US allies in the region. It was only after the US invaded both Iraq and Afghanistan (the two countries on either side of Iran) that Iran elected a new hard-line anti-Western government, largely out of fear of what the US was doing.
But let's skip that. Is the US prepared to become the world's police force, and become involved in every miltiary conflict to insure the outcome we want? Or is Iraq the only country we should stay in forever, just because it might be attacked by its neighbor.
2007-03-08 16:11:14 · answer #3 · answered by coragryph 7 · 4⤊ 4⤋
Maybe the Dems are really just Iranians made up to look like US politicians! Kinda like the Wayan Bros. did in White Chicks! Since they obviously sympathize with them!
Coragryph, Iran has been anti-American since 1979 when Khomeini took over after the Islamic Revolution!
2007-03-08 16:13:56 · answer #4 · answered by Bunz 5 · 0⤊ 4⤋
Bush ensured the instability of Iraq by destroying it himself and not being intelligent to foresee that there are a lot of Arabs in the world and he can't kill all of them
2007-03-08 16:22:31 · answer #5 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It is and has been since 300BCA
Post treaty of Versailles borders only divide the land the people are still united as She'a
Go big Red Go
2007-03-08 16:10:23 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Why do the reps want to bomb every country in the world including their own?
2007-03-08 17:14:22 · answer #7 · answered by trevor22in 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Democrats have misinterpreted the message of the American people. Instead of winning, they heard running. The path of least resistance is often taken by today's Democrats and it's a shame. The party once had honor and vision.
2007-03-08 16:05:58 · answer #8 · answered by Griff 5 · 2⤊ 3⤋
Why do the dems think that announcing a time-table to the world would be a good idea? No one knows the answer. Oh wait, publicity over lives, my bad
2007-03-08 16:07:27 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 4⤋
You know that for sure. Wow you can predict the future. When will I be able to retire? You should be able to answer that since you seem to be so sure of your predictions. You could provide some reference for one to look at or we consider it your opinion. So it's your opinion so what?
2007-03-08 16:16:24 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋