English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

At school we have been talking about the assassination of president Kennedy. I have never been so interested in S.S, until now. This topic is so fascinating to me-all the mystery in it!! I believe that there was a second gunman! If you have seen the film, you'll see that the presidents head blew BACK from the third shot fired. The second shot hit the president in the back of the neck-it came from behind the president. But the third shot forced the president's head back-and sort of at a angle, which means that it must have came from in front of the president-from the grassy knoll! The investigation of this tragic event was all screwed up! What are all your thoughts on this, if you have anymore information on this-please let me know it. Thank you in advance!

2007-03-08 14:27:04 · 13 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Government

I'm not talking about the Hollywood film production-I'm talking about the zimmerman film-(i think thats how you spell it)

2007-03-08 14:49:55 · update #1

Oh, and to some who say that someone would have seen a second gunman iin the grassy knoll-someone did spot a puff of gunsmoke from over there!! AND If you have seen the movie I'm talking about-one of the officers that was riding a motercycle right behind the president-after the third shot was fired-he ran to the grassy knoll area-because thats where he believed the shot to be fired from!

2007-03-08 14:53:42 · update #2

the Zapruter film-thats right!!! Anyway-the car didn't stop when the president was killed-so that theory can't work! This is a big mystery to me-there had to have been a second gunman! And the investigation WAS screwed up! The whole-'Magic bullet' theory is crap! And I truley believe that Oswald didn't work alone!!

2007-03-08 14:59:29 · update #3

13 answers

There was no doubt a second gunman. You are refering to the Zapruder film by the way. The question is who was he working for, most likely elements with in the u.s government. Who had the means, motivation, and opportunity to commit the crime. The stroy goes alot deeper than even the movie JFK. There is also a video that day that you can watch online that shows the security detail being backed away just minutes before the shooting- Why? It is also very clear that the autopsy was fixed. It was against the law to transport the body, by the way the man who conducted the autopsy had never done one before. The list goes on and on, but if you really want a good conspiracy that is more relevant look into the events of 9/11. Watch 911 Mysteries or 9/11 Revisited online for a good start.

2007-03-08 15:03:25 · answer #1 · answered by Luke F 3 · 2 0

Get a copy of the Warren Commission Report on the Assassination of the President. It will explain the Zapruder film and how the Commission experts explain the film.

In your own analysis, keep in mind that the car was moving. If you've ever been in a car that made a sudden lurch forward or unexpected stop, you'll understand where I'm coming from on this.

I am quite sure there was no second gunman on the grassy knoll or elsewhere. I'm glad this piqued your interest in Social Studies and I hope that continues. There are lots of interesting happenings and mysteries in our past.

2007-03-08 14:47:01 · answer #2 · answered by SA Writer 6 · 1 0

Yes, it is a very interesting theory and story, but it's unbelievable. The fact is top secret information almost always comes into the light...meaning the public will find out. After 45 years and the "truth" of a second gunman has not come out because there was no second gunman. It would have come out by now. You cannot avoid leaks, especially of this magnitude.

2007-03-08 14:31:24 · answer #3 · answered by Groovy 6 · 0 1

i started watching the coverage about three hours after the event. due to a soccer injury the day of, i was off and able to watch everything from there on. it was weird. yes, the magic bullet that came from behind and struck from in front. they focused immediately on the window in the book depository. the cameras zeroed in.

but i wonder, and it only makes sense that the bullet came from the knoll, but one camera was on the street between the motorcade and the knoll; why didn't they turn around? i would think, if i was holding the camera, i would have ducked. this cameraman did not. a silenced round, perhaps?

then i watched the ruby thing live. wow. execution. in front of the world.

.

2007-03-08 14:47:52 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Only Harvey Oswald was identified as the lone gunman who shot Kennedy and linked the killing to Cubans and Russians. The other suspected gunmen were not caught because they will tell the truth about the conspiracy.

2007-03-08 14:58:10 · answer #5 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 0 0

The theory has been scrutinized by top detectives and proven flawed. Where would the second gunman have ran to without being seen carrying the rifle. I still have my doubts that Oswald did the shooting but his story died the day he was killed.

2007-03-08 14:36:25 · answer #6 · answered by ? 5 · 1 0

the persons who say it replaced right into a hoax are in simple terms stupid. i replaced right into a young person-ager whilst he replaced into killed. i replaced into in my intense college biology classification whilst the fact got here to visit the college's intercom equipment. Kennedy's dying replaced into no longer a hoax. i visit function that the "respected" explanation of the activities of the day, as given by skill of the Warren fee document, replaced into exceedingly suspect on the time. That document could have secure a huge conceal-up. particularly some people theory it replaced right into a huge-time conceal-up. however the authentic tale will probable never be regular. you could undergo in concepts that in the time of 1963, terrorists have been something in a some distance distant land. We have been nonetheless 30+ years far off from acts of terror on our very own soil. An open motor vehicle replaced into particularly regular for that era. as nicely which, JFK replaced right into a regular president, rather speaking. no person theory he could develop into this type of objective. on account that then, we've discovered to be much less trusting.

2016-11-23 16:30:10 · answer #7 · answered by fulgham 4 · 0 0

This is quite a subject with me as well, it is very significant in American History and is a very mysterious story as well.

Everyone has their own opinions on this (including me), but the bottom line is that no one actually knows, and we probably never will. That is what makes it so fascinating.

2007-03-09 00:38:48 · answer #8 · answered by frenchy62 7 · 0 0

The Warren Comm has spoken, Only one killer. By the way,,,they have yet to find any expert rifleman who can duplicate that shot. Ozzy was just a marksman in the corps, thats the lowest classification.

2007-03-09 02:11:51 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

My thoughts are that unfortunately, we will never know the exact real truth. There is clear evidence that Oswald didn't act alone... but once again, we will never know for sure...

2007-03-08 16:06:42 · answer #10 · answered by BeachBum 7 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers