English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

2007-03-08 13:45:38 · 4 answers · asked by princess 1 in Arts & Humanities History

4 answers

I must agree with the previous answer. However I'll assume that your question deals with unconditional surrender. The pros were that it was clear to the Axis powers that they would not be allowed to reach a negotiated settlement which left them in power. The negative aspect of this was that the war was carried to its final conclusion by people who had nothing to lose by continuing to fight.

2007-03-08 14:05:13 · answer #1 · answered by Bullwinkle Moose 6 · 0 0

The con was, of course, that the Axis leaders had no reason to surrender and fought to the end.

The pro was that the demand of unconditional surrender held the Allies together. All was not sweetness and light between all the Allied leaders, and Stalin was especially suspicious that the other Allies would make a separate peace with Hitler, and then all would attack him.

This belief was not limited to Stalin. Goering and many other Nazi leaders felt they could negotiate such a deal. The firm resolve on unconditional surrender made it a fantasy that would not split the Allies up.

A further issue, and I suppose a pro, was that the public of all the Allied nations wanted it unconditional. They had given the Germans terms in 1918, and they were not disposed to settle for less than complete victory. No elected government would have survived a peace that allowed the Nazis to survive.

2007-03-08 19:51:30 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Political prisoners, gypsies, handicapped and retarded people, "undesireables" have been all despatched to concentration camps. POW camps have been run in plenty a similar way as concentration camps, however the certainty that your grandfather stated he replaced into going to a concentration camp somewhat of a POW camp does no longer advise he replaced into mendacity. In his concepts, they could have meant a similar element. If he replaced into the only POW interior the gang, he could have been placed with a team being despatched to a concentration camp because of the fact it replaced into in simple terms extra easy on account that Jews have been being shipped en masse to concentration camps, exceedingly if he replaced into being shipped from Italy to Germany. that ought to have been a protracted thank you to deliver a single POW. There must be any type of motives as to why he stated that. It would not advise he replaced into mendacity. have fun your grandfather's heroic provider and be happy that there have been adult males like that and ARE women and adult males like that who have been and are keen to furnish their lives on your freedom. it particularly is too undesirable you probably did no longer write down his account and question him added approximately it so so which you could submit it. Veterans of WWII are few and lots between. enormously quickly there will be no first hand bills of that conflict.

2016-11-23 16:27:34 · answer #3 · answered by jech 4 · 0 0

I have no idea what your question means. Rephrase and try again. soften?? Soviet?

2007-03-08 13:48:01 · answer #4 · answered by bigjohn B 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers