English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

His ''strategy" for Irag is to let the next adninistration resolve his quagmire, so why is he boosting he"ll veto Democratic plans to end the war in 2008?

2007-03-08 13:31:05 · 4 answers · asked by razor 5 in Politics & Government Government

4 answers

I'm gonna go ahead and veto your dumb question when I report it to Yahoo for asking the same question multiple times. Who's jackassed off now?

2007-03-08 13:35:35 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

He's determined to show nobody can stop him. Besides the troop surge of 21,500(which was absolutely all they needed) there are now 2200 US troops to be Iraqi police and another 2400 "support" troops. Which could be as high as 7,000 more. All this, approved by the pentagon, no need for congressional approval! I can't imagine I'll ever support a war again, even one that seems necessary. Once that happens, the president does anything he wants.

2007-03-08 21:39:25 · answer #2 · answered by Middleclassandnotquiet 6 · 1 2

Back off on the Bush bashng. Would you rather fight Islamic terrorists there or here. I would much rather see them destroy Iraq than any part of the the US.

2007-03-08 21:38:33 · answer #3 · answered by notadeadbeat 5 · 1 1

has razor ever served???would he ever serve??? come back when you are old enuff to vote...meanwhile continue making paper airplanes in your mom's basement/

2007-03-08 23:21:23 · answer #4 · answered by bushfan88 5 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers