like the egomaniac he is, this is his way of planning for the future! he is determined to put his stamp on history! and leave what he foolishly believes is a great legacy! and if the people vote in another republican to carry on his policies, then the PEOPLE! OF AMERICA SHOULD BE ASHAMED OF THEMSELVES! AND HAVE NO ONE TO BLAME BUT THEIR STUPID SELVES FOR ELECTING ANOTHER REPUBLICAN!
2007-03-08 13:31:59
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
You must be kidding me .... Bush is simply trying to clean up the complete MESS that Billary left the country in.
When Bill and HITLARy walked out of the White House with all the china, silverware and etc, they left the ...
- Country was in a recession.
- Ignored the 4 prior attacks on the US
- Release Bin Laden from custody
- the Military at all time record lows in terms of forces and equipment.
He will veto it because we are not going to sit on our hands and ignore attacks on the US like Billary did.
2007-03-08 21:29:29
·
answer #2
·
answered by ValleyR 7
·
1⤊
1⤋
Anyone with any sense would know that ending the war in Iraq by just pulling out would only bring the fight to the U.S. soil. As long as we fight in other lands we keep them off ours. If you think you have a better way then please spit it out. It been shown over the years that if you try to pull back in side our boarders and let the world do as it wants, the bad boys get wild and have a 9/11.
2007-03-11 07:29:45
·
answer #3
·
answered by allen w 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Bush's planned veto is vetoing the funding for the troops. He supports them dying but not having the proper equipment.
2007-03-08 21:30:12
·
answer #4
·
answered by Al Dave Ismail 7
·
0⤊
1⤋
I hope you live long enough to see what happens to "Our Country" when the Bush Administration leaves.
"God Bless Your Soul" and all of the people you LOVE !
2007-03-08 21:35:09
·
answer #5
·
answered by LN has3 zjc 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
The guy should go back to where he came from, Haliburton! Hilary will fix this mess!
2007-03-08 21:29:47
·
answer #6
·
answered by Trapped in a Box 6
·
1⤊
1⤋
because he doesn't want to end it, he just doesn't want to deal with it. Essentially he wants someone else to do it for him without ending the war.
2007-03-08 21:30:13
·
answer #7
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
because pelosi doesn't have the b@lls to win the war now
2007-03-08 21:28:59
·
answer #8
·
answered by tom4bucs 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Sore loser
2007-03-08 21:29:15
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋