English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Our presidential hopeful is at it again, trying to start a bill of rights for our troops. Being a Marine, we as Americans are protected by the Bill or Rights, no need to write another. Hillary stop grandstanding and do something meaningful

2007-03-08 13:07:26 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

16 answers

Hillary is full of Crap. She hates the military and if she thinks this BS that she is trying to pull off will get the military to forget about her abhorrence of the military, she is dumber than she looks.

2007-03-08 13:10:16 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 4

This suggestion from the First lady that wouldn't allow a Uniformed Service person in the White house......
The wife of a President that wouldn't salute his Marine Entourage...
The woman that thought of the military as her personal wait staff
The wife of a Draft Dogeng Commie Sympathizer
Besides the Military has the Bill of Rights and UCMJ.....Just another Grandstanding maneuver by the woman that brought you nothing

2007-03-08 13:19:42 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Hillary is a member of the Senate Armed Services Committee.

Her proposals include, pre-screening troops for physical and mental conditions before they are deployed, and giving single parents in uniform more guardianship options.

She also insisted more needs to be done for those suffering traumatic brain injuries, which she called "the signature injury of the war in Iraq."

2007-03-09 18:17:58 · answer #3 · answered by GO HILLARY 7 · 0 0

As a 13-year Army veteran who experienced almost all 8 years of Billary's Shame, I have no desire to have anything to do with The Shrill One.

We have our Bill of Rights. Hey Hillary, how about recognizing that one, especially the "free exercise" clause of the first, and "shall not be infringed" in the second, before you set about writing another?

2007-03-08 13:17:04 · answer #4 · answered by dBalcer 3 · 2 1

Doing something such as this isn't meaningful? You have got to be kidding. What do you have against this? Apparently it is something that is needed -- can you say Walter Reed? Can you say ill-equipped troops?

The same as the Patients' Bill of Rights -- posted in every hospital is the Patients' Bill of Rights. These were established in 1998 to improve the quality of health care and protect the dignity of hospital patients.

Obviously these special "Bill of Rights" are necessary to reinforce something that should be so plainly obvious.

2007-03-08 13:16:37 · answer #5 · answered by Luxxor 1 · 1 2

What does Hillary care about our service men and women? What did she do when Bill let our soldier's be murdered by terrorists on the USS Cole in Yemen? What did she do concerning our embassy is Africa, that was attacked by terrorists, and people died? What did she do about Somalia, when her husband wouldn't let our soldier's fight, but made them watch while innocent people were slaughtered? You can't tell me Ms. Clinton didn't "advise" her dumb husband on what tactics to take during his presidency. She let him get away with cheating on her, and even held his hand when the cameras were on her on the White House Lawn! She doesn't give squat about our military. She would rather see them cower to the world, while she sits in the Lincoln bedroom sipping ice cold lemon flavored Vodka, with Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, the leader of Iran!

2007-03-08 13:22:47 · answer #6 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 0 1

The military is a dictatorship & for good reason. Fighting wars means hard core disciplin & no complaining because it's a life and death situation. If you started getting troops complaining that someone is violating their bill of rights it could get people killed. I totally agree with you. But libs like Hilary love to get Govt. invovled in everything they possible can get into & that usually means that totally make it worse.

2007-03-08 13:17:56 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Soldiers are protected by the Bill of Rights under the Constitution and there is no need to make a similar law for the soldiers because it is an exercise in futility.

2007-03-08 13:11:07 · answer #8 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 2 2

Having CHECKED the item, it would not aspect out President Obama once... that stated, i'm thoroughly hostile to it !!! FIRST to those who declare that smoking makes for ineffectual infantrymen: i began smoking in boot camp and continued for my 15 years contained in the military, and in no way did i'm getting below an ideas-blowing on the actual Readiness try or my annual SAR Swimmer attempting out. Ten years later, i visit nonetheless tournament the genuine skills for my age-team. 2d... at NO aspect in enlisting or commissioning does a soldier, sailor, airman, or Marine EVER "signal away" a unmarried one among their rights as a citizen. We comply with stricter guidelines and guidelines, yet we do not signal away rights. As to the argument that it will "keep funds"... it gained't... 30% of the protection stress, those who smoke, WILL wave bye-bye on the top of their contracts and could could get replaced. Now do you imagine those well being-nazis are going to signal up or push their babies into the service ?? NOPE, so lets could extend pay to seize them in. I served on a deliver again in 1990 that attempted to flow smoke-loose... the commanding officer became relieved because he had only violated the rights of easily everyone on board by technique of affirming a ban. i'm only ill of the well being-nazis and their nanny-state mentality... they raised taxes on tobacco nationally and in California. yet did not contact alcohol... too many Merlot sipping liberals to offend.

2016-12-05 10:45:54 · answer #9 · answered by endicott 4 · 0 0

Just what we need. Servicemen charging a hill, with a rifle in one hand and a cellphone for their lawyer in another.

It's actually sort of insulting. Doesn't she think that when someone joins the military, they've got a pretty good idea of what they're getting into?

2007-03-08 13:11:17 · answer #10 · answered by Pythagoras 7 · 2 1

They have one. It's called the UCMJ.

But, Hillary the military hater wouldn't know about that.

Lord help us if this shrike manages to get into the Oval Office!

2007-03-08 13:10:47 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 2 2

fedest.com, questions and answers