Do you think that there's a difference between good and beautiful? i think "good" deals more with style, and technique. while beauty deals more with the "Feeling"
2007-03-08 12:57:51 · 4 answers · asked by sidenafil 2 in Arts & Humanities ➔ Visual Arts ➔ Other - Visual Arts
It all depends on the viewers interpretation and how they are affected. Beauty is in the eyes of the beholder
2007-03-09 01:58:36 · answer #1 · answered by kitsune_rose_chan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The Last Supper. DaVinci It is good as a representation of who attended the event,it is geometrically in the style of it time, it is a good representation of an event.
All depends on the observer, one day a thing can be beautiful,another day it may not appear so.
2007-03-08 13:14:58 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
To me the Mona Lisa is good, but she sure aint beautiful! Ditto Whistler's Mother. Did I just say "ditto Whistler's Mother?" that sounds kind of dirty now that I hear it.
Since Jesse below me thinks Mona Lisa is so beautiful, I darn sure don't want to see his girlfriend. Come to think of it based on his snippy little answer I'll bet he never had or wanted a GIRLfriend.
2007-03-08 13:03:28 · answer #3 · answered by YahooGuru2u 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Joel Peter Whitkin takes photos of cadavers that he poses.
It's very interesting, but it's far from what I would call beauty.
The two people above me who said that da Vinci's Mona Lisa and last supper aren't beautiful are complete idiots.
potentially disturbing
2007-03-08 13:31:36 · answer #4 · answered by Jesse 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋