reckon it'd be pretty hard to get rid of fightin totally but if there were stringent rules in place (lets forget about how these would be enforced) to only allow hand held blades (swords, knives) and simple bows in combat think people would be less inclined to fight? seein the enemy up close like that. could it be more 'noble'?
2007-03-08 12:29:47 · 5 answers · asked by play_doh_dude 2 in Society & Culture ➔ Other - Society & Culture
Hmmm. I think it could work, if it were also limited to the leaders.
That way, the big mouths would have to back it up.
2007-03-08 12:33:17 · answer #1 · answered by nora22000 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
In theory, I guess that would be better. But in practice, you can't actually stop your enemy from pulling out the nuclear bomb on you... after all, in the end the stronger military power wins, noble or ignoble.
God bless... and I ask God to bless the asker at the end of almost every answer I give. If you don't want God's blessings, you aren't forced to take them. I don't control the flow of them, anyway; I merely ask on your behalf.
2007-03-08 20:33:06 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no i doubt it would stop people fighting, how many knife fights do you see on the streets etc.
I think killing is bad no matter if you're standing ten or two metres away from the person.
2007-03-08 20:32:43 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
it never stopped the slaughter in the past ..
2007-03-08 20:32:12 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
sure!
2007-03-08 20:32:15 · answer #5 · answered by pas 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋