Freeh (Former FBI Head) says the former president let down the American people and the families of victims of the Khobar Towers terror attack in Saudi Arabia. After promising to bring to justice those responsible for the bombing that killed 19 and injured hundreds, Freeh says Clinton refused to personally ask Saudi Crown Prince Abdullah to allow the FBI to question bombing suspects the kingdom had in custody – the only way the bureau could secure the interviews, according to Freeh. Freeh writes in the book, “Bill Clinton raised the subject only to tell the crown prince that he understood the Saudis’ reluctance to cooperate and then he hit Abdullah up for a contribution to the Clinton Presidential Library.” Says Freeh, “That’s a fact that I am reporting
2007-03-08 11:46:03 · 15 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Tina- I sort of like your dirty talk
2007-03-08 11:50:51 · update #1
Funny statutes of Limitations only apply to one side. So Never mention WMD or My Pet Goat, or Bush AWOL. - You think you would care that us people were killed and Clinton refused to do as he was asked.
2007-03-08 11:53:59 · update #2
According to most of the liberal answerers here we only have to hear about Bush and his mistakes until January. Then by their reasoning nothing he has done will matter any more.
2007-03-08 11:58:37 · answer #1 · answered by moezambik 2 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Louis Freeh – Director of the FBI, 1993 - 2001. Former U.S. District Court Judge for the Southern District of New York, appointed by President George H.W. Bush. Former Deputy United States Attorney in New York. Former FBI agent. Former officer in the United States Army JAG Corps Reserve.
Essay An Incomplete Investigation - Why did the 9/11 Commission ignore "Able Danger"? Wall Street Journal 11/17/05: "Even the most junior investigator would immediately know that the name and photo ID of Atta in 2000 is precisely the kind of tactical intelligence the FBI has many times employed to prevent attacks and arrest terrorists. Yet the 9/11 Commission inexplicably concluded that it "was not historically significant." This astounding conclusion--in combination with the failure to investigate Able Danger and incorporate it into its findings--raises serious challenges to the commission's credibility and, if the facts prove out, might just render the commission historically insignificant itself. … No wonder the 9/11 families were outraged by these revelations and called for a "new" commission to investigate." http://www.opin
Editor's note: The 9/11 Commission Report asserts that only three of the alleged hijackers were known to U.S. intelligence agencies prior to 9/11; Nawaf al-Hazmi, Salem al-Hazmi, and Khalid al-Mihdar. There is no mention in the Report that the names and photographs of alleged hijacker Marwan al-Shehhi and alleged ring-leader Mohamed Atta had been identified by the Department of Defense antiterrorist program known as Able Danger more than a year prior to 9/11 and that they were known to be affiliates of al-Qaida. Able Danger also identified Nawaf al-Hazmi and Khalid al-Mihdar. http://www.foxnews.com. See also Rep. Curt Weldon, Lt. Col. Anthony Shaffer, Capt. Scott J. Phillpott, Major Erik Kleinsmith, and James D. Smith.
Bio: http://www.fbi.gov/libref/directors/freeh.htm
2007-03-08 11:50:39 · answer #2 · answered by dstr 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Former President Clinton is easy to trash, he gave us much ammo to work with. One question that comes to mind is, can we believe Louis Freeh? The Clinton's are extremely self serving civil servants. The two of them are in politics to become rich, and they have certainly accomplished their goal.
2007-03-08 12:02:23 · answer #3 · answered by Kurt 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The Saudis handled the Khobar Towers bombing. Freeh and the FBI in the 1990s did little to nothing in stopping anti american terrorism. Freeh is the real loser as he headed a toothless FBI in the 90s.
2007-03-08 11:50:11 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 3⤋
Gee letting us down by not trying to offend the Saudi's I wonder who else we can put into that category. How many of those suicide bombers from 9-11 where from Saudi Arabia? Hmmm, what country did we go invade again? Who is always seen hanging with the Saudi Royal Family? Couldn't be the Bush's now could it?
2007-03-08 11:51:53 · answer #5 · answered by mrlebowski99 6 · 2⤊ 2⤋
nicely considering the fact that Hillary Clinton is the antichrist and that i specific dont want her to Rule i might vote for Mccain..yet considering the fact that hes a republican I dont want yet another bush sooooooo Its hillary I advise how undesirable can that is?
2016-09-30 10:06:05 · answer #6 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No I don't and did you know that the CIA bashed on Bush in the 2006 Senate Pre-War on Iraq Report?
2007-03-08 11:50:00 · answer #7 · answered by PROUD TO BE A LIBERAL TEEN! 4 · 2⤊ 2⤋
Did you know you can find people that will say bad things about Clinton and say they are facts?
Did you also know that you can find people that will say bad things about Bush and say they are facts?
2007-03-08 11:51:24 · answer #8 · answered by beren 7 · 4⤊ 0⤋
Coming from the F.B.I. - the glass house bit and projectiles would apply beautifully here.
2007-03-08 11:49:21 · answer #9 · answered by vanamont7 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
No I didn't. Who cares about a Clinton bashing book during a Bush presidency? Can Clinton RIP or will the right haunt him to his grave?
2007-03-08 11:48:27 · answer #10 · answered by Chi Guy 5 · 3⤊ 4⤋