Whitewater, too immature and unrealistic about real world to see pitfall? Pardons at end of terms? Didn't learn from Whitewater? I've been busting Giuliani, why can't I bring this to question. I think President Clinton did more for USA than any President since? I voted 2 times for him, and I thought he arrogant and supercilious. BUT, he bombed bin-Laden until Republicans stopped him. Bombed Lybia. Govenment had surpluses until President Bush. Historians will decide or muddle the character defects. But, he is a very strange person?
2007-03-08 11:18:34 · 7 answers · asked by peter s 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
All Presidents have character flaws, and the American people by and large are willing to tolerate a substantial host of them - as long as they believe in the general leadership of the President.
I would wager to say that infidelity had a far lesser impact on the well-being of the nation than the weak-minded incompetence of the current.
2007-03-08 11:33:38 · answer #1 · answered by buzzfeedbrenny 5 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Just to respond to the above--
President Clinton was apparently obsessed with finding and bringing bin Laden to justice. He did bomb a training camp where bin Laden had been recently seen, but struck an empty tent (hence, G. Bush campaigning that he would not be using a $1million bomb on a $20 tent when he is president).
The fact is this: Clinton was one of the most effective presidents in history. However, the Republicans were against him because he is a Democrat. There are, paradoxically, many policies that have been espoused by GW Bush taht have traditionally been Democratic favorites (isn't it the Democrats who have argued that the US has a moral obligation to bring its wealth and power to the aid of those oppressed by dictators -- yet the Dems are against the toppling of the dictatorship in Iraq). The thought that there are any ideals in politics is out-dated. Its all about power.
2007-03-08 19:53:18 · answer #2 · answered by robert_dod 6 · 2⤊ 1⤋
bombed Bin Laden??? If bombed in your little world means "let him escape", then yeah....he bombed him.
2007-03-08 19:23:08 · answer #3 · answered by Johnny Conservative 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
um, just how did he bomb bin-laden again?
He was too busy "bombing" lewinsky, remember??
2007-03-08 19:26:52 · answer #4 · answered by britt g 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
because he is a demcrat
2007-03-08 19:22:16 · answer #5 · answered by Brandon 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
he was probably on crack or something....he couldn't even keep himself in his pants....
2007-03-08 19:32:26 · answer #6 · answered by amymrgrt 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
hello points!!!
2007-03-08 19:26:09 · answer #7 · answered by Morgan 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋